User talk:Volunteer Marek
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor | |
| "happy that we finally got a 'self-described neutral observer'" - that made me laugh. That was a positive add. Rockypedia (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC) |
A beer for you!
|
I was wondering why I saw you clearing your talk page. Drmies (talk) 04:49, 27 February 2019 (UTC) |
- Gandy orders a second round. Cheers to one of our best! Gandydancer (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- *hic* here's another :) sláinte! ——SerialNumber54129 15:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
|
A Resilient Barnstar |
| I’m very sorry to see the harassment you have faced. Stay strong Volunteer Marek! starship.paint (talk) 16:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC) |
Rfc you may be interested in
Please visit Talk:Ethnic_cleansing#RfC, opened by User:buidhe. Debresser (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Category:Recipients of the Warsaw Cross of the Uprising has been nominated for listification then upmerging
Category:Recipients of the Warsaw Cross of the Uprising has been nominated for listification then upmerging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 10:08, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
Article sourcing requirements
In your edits on the Holocaust in Poland, you've restored sources that don't comply with the article sourcing requirements. If you don't remove them, I will have to make an AE report. (t · c) buidhe 17:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Buidhe: How about you first point out which sources you're referring to? I can't read your mind and you haven't bothered to discuss this at all. At the same time you clearly removed sources which easily meet the requirement like Yad Vashem. Please don't do that. Volunteer Marek 17:58, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Volunteer Marek. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 18:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. This is just about a block appeal in which you were mentioned. 331dot (talk) 16:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Quotes (user page)
Damn. Respect. El_C 17:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Reliable sources noticeboard
Polite request: In future, if you are going to baselessly accuse people of xenophobia and threaten them with topic bans, could you possibly ping them in your comment? This allows them a right of reply. Boynamedsue (talk) 11:29, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Please moderate your tone
In re: your perennial practice of inserting yourself into conversations that do not involve you
; extremely rude
; You're grasping at straws
[1], the tone of these comments is inappropriate. The sarcasm and belittling of others are unhelpful in resolving disputes in this sensitive topic area. --K.e.coffman (talk) 04:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am neither "belittling" anyone nor am I employing sarcasm. My comment is 100% appropriate since I do not appreciate the user in question continuously WP:STALKing my edits and engaging in constant sniping and taunting.
- We've been here before User:K.e.coffman. Previously you repeatedly defended a Wikipedia user who went on to harass me and threaten me and my family in real life (and as a result got indef banned). You did this even as the user in question made personal attacks and ethnic insults in my regard on Wikipedia, which you studiously ignored, even supported, while at same time trying to lecture me about how my response to these was "inappropriate" (because what? I'm suppose to be all laughs and smiles about someone smearing me and attacking me?). I really hoped you'd learn something from that sorry episode. But here you are doing the same in regard to Icewhiz's on-Wiki friend.
- If you want to get sanctimonious about something, here you go, here is some inappropriate personal attacks, insults, and taunts you can get worked about:
- And that's just really quick pull from some of their latest comments.
- I'm sorry but since you've chosen to either ignore, excuse or enable abuse and attacks by one side in this debate, attacks and abuse which have led to real life harassment and consequences, while at the same time trying to falsely cast my reasonable requests and comments as "inappropriate" for some reason (apparently not wanting to be stalked and harassed across Wikipedia is now "inappropriate") I am not going to tolerate your bad faithed commentary and set ups on my talk page.
- I've had enough. Stay off my talk page K.e.coffman. Do not post here again. Volunteer Marek 11:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
I should add, for your elucidation, that the user in question User:François Robere, has been warned for exactly this kind of behavior, then warned again, warned again, warned again (by User:Black Kite), warned again, then warned yet again, then again warned for WP:STALKing another user's edits to "cause them stress" [6] (by User:RexxS, then had to EXPLICITLY commit to NOT stalking another user, warned again, then blocked (by User:TonyBallioni), then put under an interaction ban [7] precisely for the behavior that they've been engaged in the past few weeks. Behavior which you, K.e.coffman, are apparently 100% fine with. Only thing that's happened is that FR, unable to follow around and stalk their usual target due to the interaction ban, has redirected their energy at me. Volunteer Marek 12:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)