Jump to content

Titan (submersible)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Cyclops II)

Titan
Titan in a promotional image published by OceanGate before 2023
History
NameTitan
OwnerOceanGate, Inc.
Operator OceanGate, Inc.
Completed2018
FateImploded on 18 June 2023 (1 years ago)
General characteristics
Class and typeUnclassed submersible
Displacement
Length6.7 m (22 ft)[1]
Beam2.8 m (9 ft 2 in)
Height2.5 m (8 ft 2 in)
Propulsion4 × Innerspace 1002 electric thrusters
Speed3 knots (5.6 km/h) (max)
Endurance96 hours (w/ 5 people)
Test depthUp to 4,000 m (13,000 ft)
Capacity5 people
Crew1 pilot, 1 technical expert, 3 passengers

Titan, previously named Cyclops 2, was a submersible created and operated by the American underwater-tourism company OceanGate. It was the first privately-owned submersible with a claimed maximum depth of 4,000 m (13,000 ft),[2] and the first completed crewed submersible with a hull constructed of titanium and carbon fiber composite materials.[3]

After testing with dives to its maximum intended depth in 2018 and 2019, the original composite hull of Titan developed fatigue damage and was replaced by 2021.[4][5] In that year, OceanGate began transporting paying customers to the wreck of the Titanic,[6][7] completing several dives to the wreck site in 2021 and 2022. During the submersible's first 2023 expedition, all five occupants were killed when the vessel imploded. OceanGate lost contact with Titan on 18 June and contacted authorities later that day after the submersible was overdue for return. A massive international search and rescue operation ensued and ended on 22 June, when debris from Titan was discovered about 1,600 feet (500 metres) from the bow of the Titanic.

Background

[edit]

Since the discovery of the Titanic wreckage in 1985, limited tours of the wreck have been conducted, including the (Finnish-made) Russian Mir-class submersibles in the 1990s, which captured the footage for the opening scenes of the eponymous 1997 film.[6][8][9]

After carrying tourists to the wreck of the Andrea Doria in 2016, OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush said "there's only one wreck that everyone knows... if you ask people to name something underwater, it's going to be sharks, whales, Titanic."[6] OceanGate's Titan was used for several survey expeditions of the Titanic wreckage site, starting in 2021. Rush stated that Titan could be used to explore the debris field and build a 3-D model of the wreck.[6]

Design and construction

[edit]

Features

[edit]
Schematic of Titan, with human figures for scale

Titan was 670 cm × 280 cm × 250 cm (22.0 ft × 9.2 ft × 8.2 ft) and weighed 9,525 kg (21,000 lb) with a maximum payload of 685 kg (1,510 lb). It moved at up to 3 kn (5.6 km/h) using four electric thrusters, arrayed two horizontal and two vertical. According to OceanGate, the vessel carried sufficient oxygen to sustain a full complement of five people for 96 hours.[10]

The entire pressure vessel for the crew used five major components: two hemispherical titanium end caps, two matching titanium interface rings, and the 142 cm (56 in) internal diameter, 2.4-meter-long (7.9 ft) carbon fiber-wound cylindrical hull.[11] The forward hemispherical end cap could be detached from its interface ring, becoming a hatch that allowed crew members to enter the crew compartment before a mission, and exit at its conclusion.[3] In addition to the crew compartment, Titan included a landing skid structure and an outer fiberglass composite shell covering mechanical equipment; both the skid and shell were bolted to the titanium interface rings.[3]

OceanGate's calculations showed the cylinder that formed the center section of the crew compartment should have a wall thickness of 4.5 in (114 mm), which they rounded up to 5.0 in (127 mm); it consisted of 480 alternating layers of pre-preg unidirectional cloth, laid in the axial direction, and wet-wound filament, laid in the hoop direction. Spencer Composites completed the design and assembly of the cylinder in 2017 after curing it at 137 °C (279 °F) for 7 days.[3]

Each titanium end cap had a wall thickness of 83 mm (3+1⁄4 in).[12] One interface ring was bonded to each end of the cylindrical hull, and the end caps were bolted to the interface rings.[3] The penetrations for external cables ran through the interface rings.[12] The forward end cap was fitted with an experimental 380 mm-diameter (15 in) acrylic window,[3][7] shaped as a modified conical frustum 180 mm (7 in) thick. According to Rush, it would protrude into the cabin by 19 mm (3⁄4 in) during dives.[12] The viewport was rated only to 650 m (2,130 ft).[13]

Titan was equipped with a real-time acoustic monitoring system, which OceanGate claimed could detect the onset of buckling in the carbon fiber hull prior to catastrophic failure.[6] Rush held a patent on the system.[14] Titan was controlled with a modified game controller, similar to Cyclops 1.[15]

Once the occupants were aboard, the hatch was closed and bolted from the outside; there was no way to open the hatch from inside the vessel. In addition, there was no on-board location system; the support ship which monitored the position of Titan relative to its target would send text messages to Titan providing distances and directions.[16]

Construction

[edit]
A March 2015 OceanGate video outlining the design of Cyclops, the predecessor to Titan

OceanGate began developing a composite carbon fiber and titanium-hulled submersible in collaboration with the University of Washington's Applied Physics Laboratory (APL-UW) in 2013,[17] tentatively named Cyclops 2; the first titanium structural components were ordered in December 2016 from Titanium Fabrication Corp. (TiFab),[18] and OceanGate signed a contract with Spencer Composites in January 2017 for the carbon-composite cylinder.[3]

Spencer previously had built the composite pressure hull for the single-person DeepFlight Challenger for Steve Fossett to a design by Graham Hawkes.[3][a] Spencer Composites was given challenging performance targets for Cyclops 2, which was meant to withstand 6,600 psi (46 MPa; 450 atm) working service pressure with a factor of safety of 2.25× for its intended maximum depth of 4,000 m (13,120 ft), and provided six weeks to complete the design.[3] In March 2018, Cyclops 2 was renamed to Titan;[20][21] and Rush described it "an amazing engineering feat" during its launch in 2018.[22]

In an interview published in 2020 with Teledyne Marine, a subsea technology company, it was noted that many Oceangate employees were recent graduates. Rush responded that he, unlike other submarine enterprises, "wanted [his] team to be younger, be inspirational" instead of including "ex-military submariners," who he described as "a whole bunch of 50-year-old white guys".[23]

Design issues

[edit]

In 2015, when Rush visited DOER Marine seeking lessons learned from "Project Deep Search", DOER's president, Liz Taylor, specifically warned him against using carbon fiber; in 2023, she recounted that carbon fiber specifically has "been shown to not be very happy when it's being immersed first of all and then being hollow on the inside or just one atmosphere on the inside and then having the tremendous pressure of the ocean trying to push in on it, it's not the right material".[24]

The Marine Technology Society's committee on Manned Underwater Vehicles (now called Submarine Committee) drafted a private letter to Rush in March 2018, expressing concerns with the design of Titan and urging him to have the ship "classed" (certified by a ship classification society), partly because the marketing of the submersible, which stated it would meet or exceed the standards of DNV, was misleading because OceanGate had no intentions to have the vehicle tested by DNV. There were 38 people who agreed to have their signature on the letter.[25] Although the letter was not sent, the chair of the committee, William Kohnen, said he had "a frank conversation" with Rush following which they "agreed to disagree".[26]

Rob McCallum had consulted for OceanGate in 2009, but left over his concerns that vessel development was being hurried. In 2018, he emailed Rush, warning him the development cycle and refusal to have the ship classed was "potentially placing yourself and your clients in a dangerous dynamic," adding that in Rush's "race to Titanic you are mirroring that famous catch cry: 'She is unsinkable.'" Rush's response called the email "a serious personal insult" and complained about "the baseless cries of 'you are going to kill someone.'"[27]

In response to the 2018 letter from MTS members, OceanGate published in 2019 a blog post explaining why Titan was not classed. In the post, OceanGate said "the vast majority of marine (and aviation) accidents are a result of operator error, not mechanical failure" and argued that classification focused solely on the physical state of the vessel and not its corporate actions, which it characterized as a "constant, committed effort and a focused corporate culture" of "maintaining high-level operational safety".[28] Bart Kemper, one of the signatories to the 2018 Marine Technology Society letter, met Rush through professional conferences and stated it was OceanGate's refusal to follow the existing engineering standards like ASME Pressure Vessels for Human Occupancy that caused him to be part of that letter. [29] Kemper is a consulting engineer who has written multiple engineering papers regarding submarine windows,[30] including the need for innovation.[31]

Journalist David Pogue, who participated in an OceanGate Titanic excursion in 2022, noted that Titan was not equipped with an emergency locator beacon; during his expedition, the surface support vessel lost track of Titan "for about five hours," and adding such a beacon was discussed. "They could still send short texts to the sub, but did not know where it was. It was quiet and very tense, and they shut off the ship's internet to prevent us from tweeting."[32] Screenwriter Mike Reiss confirmed the submersible lost contact on each of the four dives he had made with OceanGate and said "that seems to be just something baked into the system". As an example, Reiss reported that it took three hours to locate Titanic during one dive, despite landing only 460 m (500 yd) from the wreck.[33]

Testing and inspection

[edit]
Shallow water test dives were carried out in Puget Sound

OceanGate claimed on its website as of 2023 that Titan was "designed and engineered by OceanGate Inc. in collaboration [with] experts from NASA, Boeing, and the University of Washington."[34] A 1⁄3-scale model of the Cyclops 2 pressure vessel was built and tested at the University of Washington Applied Physics Laboratory; the model was able to sustain a pressure of 4,285 psi (29.54 MPa; 291.6 atm), corresponding to a depth of approximately 3,000 m (9,800 ft).[35] After the disappearance of Titan in 2023, the University of Washington stated that the Applied Physics Laboratory had no involvement in "design, engineering, or testing of the Titan submersible." A Boeing spokesperson also said that Boeing "was not a partner on the Titan and did not design or build it." A NASA spokesperson said that NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center had a Space Act Agreement with OceanGate, but "did not conduct testing and manufacturing via its workforce or facilities."[34] Rush had touted partnerships with NASA, Boeing, and UW to Pogue in 2022 in response to a question about the perceived "MacGyvery jerry-rigged-ness [sic]" improvisational design based on the use of off-the-shelf components.[16][36] Documents leaked to Wired showed that partnerships with UW and Boeing dissolved and design recommendations and rigorous testing requirements were ignored.[13]

David Lochridge, OceanGate Director of Marine Operations, inspected Titan as it was being handed over from Engineering to Operations and filed a quality control report in January 2018 in which he stated that no non-destructive testing of the carbon fiber hull had taken place to check for voids and delaminating which could compromise the hull's strength. Instead, Lochridge was told that OceanGate would rely on the real-time acoustic monitoring system, which he felt would not warn the crew of potential failure with sufficient time to safely abort the mission and evacuate. The day after he filed his report, he was summoned to a meeting in which he was told the acrylic window was only rated to 1,300 m (4,300 ft) depth because OceanGate would not fund the design of a window rated to 4,000 m (13,000 ft). In that meeting, he reiterated his concerns and added he would refuse to allow crewed testing without a hull scan; Lochridge was dismissed from his position as a result.[5] He filed a whistleblower complaint with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). OceanGate filed a lawsuit against him that June, accusing him of improperly sharing proprietary trade secrets and fraudulently manufacturing a reason to dismiss him. The suit was settled in November 2018 and he withdrew his complaint with OSHA.[13][5] The viewport was only rated to 650 m (2,130 ft).[13]

 Pogue: How many backup systems do you have for the thing collapsing?
 Rush: So the key on that one is, we have an acoustic monitoring system. Carbon fiber makes noise. There're millions of fibers there. [...] It makes noise, and it crackles. When the first time you pressurize it, if you think about it, of those million fibers, a couple of 'em are sorta weak. They shouldn't have made the team. And when it gets pressurized, they snap, and they make a noise. The first time you get to, say, 1,000 meters, it will make a whole bunch of noise. And then you back off, and it won't make any noise until you exceed the last maximum [depth]. And so when, the first time we took it to full pressure, it made a bunch of noise. The second time, it made very little noise.

 Pogue: Could you get three hours back to the surface in time [after the system provides an alert]?
 Rush: Yes. Yes, 'cause what happens is once you stop going down, the pressure, now it's easier. You just have to stop your descent.

 —Stockton Rush, 2022 interview series with David Pogue, published June 2023[12]

Initial shallow dive testing with a crew was conducted in Puget Sound.[37] OceanGate said that testing of Titan without a crew to 4,000 m (13,000 ft) was performed in June 2018 to validate the design,[38] conducted near Great Abaco Island, near the edge of the continental shelf, as the platform would only need to be towed 10 nmi (19 km) to depths exceeding 4,600 m (15,000 ft).[6] During a subsequent human-piloted descent, Rush became the second solo human to descend to 4,000 m (13,000 ft) on 10 December 2018,[37] after James Cameron, who in 2012 dove to Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench, approximately 11,000 m (36,000 ft).[6] Partway through that solo dive in December 2018, Rush used the vertical thrusters to overcome unexpected positive buoyancy when descending past 3,000 m (10,000 ft), which caused interference with the communication system, and he lost contact with the surface ship for approximately one hour.[6]

In April 2019, OceanGate announced that a crew of four had set a record by descending in Titan to 3,760 m (12,340 ft).[39] Karl Stanley,[b] who had participated in the April 2019 dive alongside Rush,[39] later sent an email to Rush stating his concerns with loud cracking noises they had experienced during the dive. In Stanley's opinion, the noises were associated with a potential "flaw/defect in one area being acted on by the tremendous pressures and being crushed/damaged," adding he felt it meant there was "an area of the hull that is breaking down."[42][43] In a later email, Stanley was more blunt in his assessment: "I think that hull has a defect near that flange, that will only get worse. The only question in my mind is will it fail catastrophically or not." Rush responded by stating more tests would be conducted.[41]

After the tests were completed in January 2020, the hull of Titan began showing signs of cyclic fatigue and the craft was de-rated to 3,000 m (9,800 ft).[4] The Spencer-built composite cylindrical hull either was repaired or replaced by Electroimpact and Janicki Industries in 2020 or 2021, prior to the first trips to Titanic.[5][44] According to Rush, the carbon fiber materials had belonged to Boeing, but OceanGate had purchased them at a significant discount because they were past their shelf-life.[45] Boeing stated they had no record showing they sold carbon fiber to OceanGate or Rush.[46]

In 2021, a new hull was constructed after a previous hull had cracked after only 50 submersion dives, only three of which were to 4,000 m. Rush lied to investors and the public claiming the delay was related to issues with maritime law. Scale models of the hull imploded at the UW lab, so a different method of curing the hull was developed and passed a full-sized pressure test at a facility in Maryland. Rush refused to construct new domes and other components from the failed submersible and instructed the engineers to salvage and reuse parts. Anonymous former employees told Wired that damage to the components could have weakened the joinery with the new hull. They also added lifting rings, which was previously warned against by engineers because the submersible could not handle any tension or load.[13]

In the first half of 2021 shallow water test dives were made in Washington state with prospective Titanic expedition passengers.[47]

In spring of 2021, one passenger did a test dive in Titan to a depth of 500 meters in Possession Sound with Rush as pilot. The passenger said that the test dive went well, and was satisfied with the safety of the submersible. He applied for a spot on the Titanic expedition, and participated in an OceanGate Titanic expedition later that year.[48]

In May 2021 television host Josh Gates and camera operator Brian Weed did a Titan test dive in Puget Sound. The dive was aborted due to multiple technical issues, reaching a depth of only 30 meters. During Gates and Weed's dive, communications were lost, the propulsion system encountered errors, and the computers on the submersible stopped working. Rush tried to reboot the submersible using its touchscreen but was unable to. Gates and Weed declined OceanGate's invitation to take part in a Titanic expedition, which began a month later.[49]

Titanic tourism operations

[edit]

Titan dives to Titanic took place during multi-day excursions organized by OceanGate. The passengers and crew would embark on the support ship from St. John's, Newfoundland, and sail southward for two days until they reached the location of the Titanic wreckage. The support ship remained stationed above the wreckage site for five days, during which dives to Titanic were attempted aboard Titan. Two dives were generally attempted during each excursion, though many dives were cancelled or aborted before reaching Titanic due to bad weather or technical malfunctions. The final two days of the excursion were spent sailing back to port.[50]

Non-crew passengers were called "mission specialists" by OceanGate. Mission specialists either paid for their spots or were invited guests such as journalists or YouTubers. When OceanGate's initial plans for the Titanic expeditions were announced in 2017 each tourist's seat was priced at US$105,129, a price OceanGate chose because it was the price of the ticket for the Vanderbilt suite on Titanic in 1912, adjusted for inflation.[51][52] Paying customers later paid up to $250,000 for the excursion.[53] OceanGate did not offer refunds. If a customer's dive was cancelled they were offered a spot on an excursion the following summer for free if the dive had been cancelled due to technical issues, and for half price if the dive had been cancelled due to weather conditions.[50]

Continued testing of the novel hull precluded operations in 2018. By 2019, the cost of a ticket on Titan to view Titanic had risen to $125,000; 54 tourists had signed up for one of six voyages that were scheduled to begin on 27 June, but those plans were delayed until 2020 because permits could not be secured for the surface support vessel.[6] The proposed operation involved MV Havila Harmony (sailing under a non-Canadian flag), and would have violated the Coasting Trade Act, which prohibits foreign-flagged vessels from conducting commercial voyages with origin and destination ports in Canada, analogous to the United States' Jones Act.[54] In January 2020, the original hull was de-rated to 3,000 m (9,800 ft) maximum depth after signs of fatigue were found,[4] and the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States delayed the procurement of carbon fiber filament needed to build a replacement hull.[55] In November 2020, Rush announced the first voyage to Titanic would be delayed to May 2021.[56]

Titanic Experience Tour

[edit]

During the off season OceanGate transported Titan around the United States on a tour they called the "Titanic Experience Tour" which consisted of both public and invitation-only events.[57][58] During the tours, visitors were able to step aboard Titan and view photos of the Titanic wreckage through the vessel's viewport.[57]

Titanic dives and dive attempts

[edit]
AHTS Horizon Arctic at Port aux Basques (August 2022)

2021

[edit]

OceanGate organized five Titanic excursions during 2021.[50] For the 2021 season, OceanGate selected Canadian-flagged AHTS Horizon Arctic as the surface support vessel.[59]

During one unsuccessful dive of 2021, Titan became stuck at the bottom of the ocean for at least four hours because of mechanical problems, and was unable to ascend to the surface and unable to reach the Titanic wreckage. Passengers aboard this dive spent 20 hours inside Titan before they reached surface and were able to get out of the submersible. A passenger aboard this dive told the Vancouver Sun in 2023 "I really had a great time on that boat trip, even though we got stuck at the bottom."[60]

2022

[edit]

In 2022 OceanGate again organized five Titanic excursions.[50][61][45] Horizon Arctic again served as the support vessel for the planned dives.[62]

Passenger Alan Estrada reached Titanic aboard Titan on 2 July 2022 and documented the experience on his YouTube channel. Estrada described his dive as "one of the more successful ones" as the vessel was able to quickly navigate to the Titanic wreckage and spent 4 hours exploring it.[63] Reporter David Pogue and crew members from CBS News took part in OceanGate's fourth Titanic excursion of 2022, which took place between 9 and 17 July.[50] Pogue boarded Titan but his dive to Titanic was cancelled. The other dive that took place during Pogue's excursion did not reach Titanic either because of technical malfunctions.[16]

2023

[edit]

Wreck expert Paul-Henri "P.H." Nargeolet, who was also onboard, told me he wasn't worried about what would happen if the structure of the Titan itself were damaged when at the bottom of the ocean. "Under that pressure, you'd be dead before you knew there was a problem." He said it with a smile.

 — as recounted by Arnie Weissmann, in Travel Weekly article published June 22, 2023[64]

For the 2023 survey expedition, OceanGate secured MV Polar Prince as its support vessel and planned to begin excursions in May.[65] According to Rush, the support ship was changed because the cost of leasing Horizon Arctic had increased to $200,000 per week. Because of the switch to Polar Prince, a platform known as the Launch and Recovery System (LARS), needed to be towed to the site, rather than carried on board.[66] Journalist Arnie Weissmann took part in the second excursion of 2023, called "Mission 2" by OceanGate, which was set to depart on 20 May 2023. During Weissmann's excursion no dives reaching Titanic took place.[64]

Implosion

[edit]
Main article: Titan submersible implosion

On 18 June 2023, during the first planned dive of the year, contact with the Titan was lost during the crew's descent to the wreckage of Titanic, about 320 nautical miles (590 km) south-southeast off the coast of Newfoundland. The submersible was carrying tourists Hamish Harding, Shahzada Dawood, his son Suleman Dawood, crew member and Titanic expert Paul-Henri Nargeolet, and OceanGate founder Stockton Rush, who was the submersible's pilot.[67][68] Several hours later, after the submersible failed to resurface at the expected time, the Polar Prince reported the situation to the United States Coast Guard. Extensive search and rescue efforts commenced.[69]

On 22 June 2023, it was confirmed that Titan had imploded, likely when communication was lost during the descent, instantly killing all five occupants on board.[51][52] The exact cause remains under investigation, although experts believe the carbon fiber used to construct the hull could have cracked under deep-sea pressure.[70][71]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ After Fossett died, DeepFlight Challenger was acquired by Richard Branson's Virgin Oceanic, which had announced plans to conduct a series of five dives to the deepest points of the oceans; DeepFlight refused to endorse the plan, as the craft had been designed to dive only once. Adam Wright, the president of DeepFlight, said in 2014 "The problem is the strength of the [DeepFlight Challenger] does decrease after each dive. It is strongest on the first dive."[19]
  2. ^ Karl Stanley was described as a "self-taught engineer" who had built and operated two submersibles before 2008.[40] Based on his experience building and testing submersibles, and taking tourists underwater, Stanley told Rush that a minimum of 50 test dives should be taken before accepting paid passengers.[41]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Titan Submersible". oceangate.com. 21 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 24 June 2023.
  2. ^ Dean, Josh (7 September 2017). "It's Brutal to Get to the Ocean's Depths. This Minisub Will Take You There". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i Sloan, Jeff (10 May 2017). "Composite submersibles: Under pressure in deep, deep waters". Composites World. Archived from the original on 4 August 2021.
  4. ^ a b c Boyle, Alan (9 January 2020). "OceanGate raises $18M to build a bigger submersible fleet and set up Titanic trips". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  5. ^ a b c d Harris, Mark (20 June 2023). "A whistleblower raised safety concerns about OceanGate's submersible in 2018. Then he was fired". TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i Perrottet, Tony (June 2019). "A Deep Dive Into the Plans to Take Tourists to the 'Titanic'". Smithsonian. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  7. ^ a b "OceanGate sub makes first dive to Titanic wreck site and captures photos of debris". GeekWire. 13 July 2021. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 19 April 2022.
  8. ^ Levenson, Eric (13 December 2018). "Inside the secret US military mission that located the Titanic". CNN. Archived from the original on 14 December 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  9. ^ Dane, Kane (11 June 2019). "Discovery Of Titanic". Titanic website. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  10. ^ "Titan 5-Person Submersible | 4,000 meters" (PDF). OceanGate. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  11. ^ "Tourist Submarine Titan Goes Missing on Its Way to the Titanic Wreck". autoevolution.com. 20 June 2023. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  12. ^ a b c d Stockton Rush (August 2022). "OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush talks Titan sub's design, carbon fiber hull, safety and more in 2022 interviews" (Interview). Interviewed by David Pogue. CBS News.
  13. ^ a b c d e Harris, Mark. "The Titan Submersible Disaster Shocked the World. The Inside Story Is More Disturbing Than Anyone Imagined". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 11 June 2024.
  14. ^ US Patent 11119071B1, Richard Stockton Rush, III, "Systems and methods for curing, testing, validating, rating, and monitoring the integrity of composite structures", published 14 September 2021, assigned to OceanGate Inc.  Archived 26 June 2023 at the Wayback Machine
  15. ^ Tucker, Emma (22 June 2023). "What it was like inside the lost Titanic-touring submersible". CNN. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  16. ^ a b c Pogue, David (27 November 2022). "Titanic: Visiting the most famous shipwreck in the world". CBS News. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  17. ^ Hickey, Hannah (8 October 2013). "UW, local company building innovative deep-sea manned submarine". UW News. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  18. ^ Boyle, Alan (9 December 2016). "OceanGate starts building submersible craft that can take crews 13,000 feet deep". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 20 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  19. ^ Mendick, Robert (13 December 2014). "Richard Branson quietly shelves Virgin submarine plan". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  20. ^ Neely, Samantha (21 June 2023). "Florida couple filed lawsuit against OceanGate CEO for canceled Titanic trip. What we know". The News-Press. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  21. ^ "OceanGate to Build Two New Submersibles for Deep Ocean Exploration, Research and Commercial Operations to Titanic Depths and Beyond" (Press release). OceanGate. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  22. ^ Titanic sub: What could have caused the implosion of the vessel? on YouTube, reported by Eric Sorensen for Global News on 23 June 2023
  23. ^ Loh, Matthew. "OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush once said that instead of older, 'ex-military submariners' hired by his rivals, he wanted a 'younger' and 'inspirational' team of 20-somethings for his Titanic submersible". Insider. Retrieved 9 July 2023.
  24. ^ Howland, Lena (27 June 2023). "Engineer says OceanGate CEO ignored warnings against use of carbon fiber for sub". WABC-TV 7 New York. Retrieved 30 June 2023.
  25. ^ Bogel-Burroughs, Nicholas; Gross, Jenny; Betts, Anna (20 June 2023). "OceanGate Was Warned of Potential for 'Catastrophic' Problems With Titanic Mission". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  26. ^ Trotta, Daniel; Brooks, Brad (22 June 2023). "Missing Titanic sub: experts raised safety concerns about OceanGate Titan in 2018". Reuters. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  27. ^ Morelle, Rebecca; Farncis, Alison; Evans, Gareth (24 June 2023). "Titan sub CEO dismissed safety warnings as 'baseless cries', emails show". BBC. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  28. ^ "Why Isn't Titan Classed?". OceanGate, Inc. 21 February 2019. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  29. ^ Sarah, Ferguson (22 June 2023). "VIDEO: Experts had previously revealed multiple concerns over the safety of missing Titan submersive". ABC 730. Australian Broadcast Company. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
  30. ^ "Research Profile: Bart Kemper". Researchgate. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
  31. ^ Kemper, Bart; Cross, Linda (20 May 2020). "Developing "Design by Analysis" Methodology for Windows for Pressure Vessels for Human Occupancy". ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Part B. 6 (3). doi:10.1115/1.4046742. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
  32. ^ Robiedo, Anthony (20 June 2023). "Reporter who rode Titanic submarine says there were 'many red flags'". USA Today. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  33. ^ Benitez, Gio; Sweeney, Sam; Shapiro, Emily (21 June 2023). "Former Titanic submersible passenger says his sub lost contact with host ship on all 4 trips". ABC News. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  34. ^ a b Mayor, Grace (22 June 2022). "Boeing and University of Washington deny OceanGate's claim that they helped design the lost Titan sub". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  35. ^ "Cyclops Next Gen: New Hull Design and Testing" (PDF). Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  36. ^ Charalambous, Peter (22 June 2023). "Company behind lost Titanic sub overstated details of partnerships with Boeing, others". ABC News. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  37. ^ a b Francis, Scott, ed. (14 December 2018). "OceanGate CEO pilots carbon fiber submersible in 4,000-m solo dive". Composites World. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023.
  38. ^ "World's Largest Carbon Fiber Manned Submersible Hull Proven to 4000 Meters" (Press release). OceanGate. 27 June 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  39. ^ a b "History Making Deep-Sea Dive To 3,760 Meters With Four Crew Members" (Press release). OceanGate. 25 April 2019. Archived from the original on 3 August 2020.
  40. ^ Walker, Thayer (6 June 2008). "Off The Deep End". Outside. Archived from the original on 2 December 2022. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  41. ^ a b Lee, Lloyd; Loh, Matthew (26 June 2023). "A submarine expert desperately tried to dissuade his friend, OceanGate CEO Stockton Rush, from taking customers in the Titan submersible, warning him against 'succumbing to pressures of your own creation,' new emails show". Insider. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  42. ^ Gross, Jenny (23 June 2023). "Submersible Expert Raised Safety Concerns After 2019 Trip on Titan". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  43. ^ Elamroussi, Aya; Sanchez, Ray; Cohen, Gabe (24 June 2023). "Investigation broadens into Titanic-bound submersible implosion as questions mount over craft's safety". CNN. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 26 June 2023.
  44. ^ "OceanGate Expeditions on LinkedIn: #throwbackthursday #carbonfiber #aerospace #titanic". Archived from the original on 24 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  45. ^ a b Weissmann, Arnie (21 June 2023). "Mission Titanic, Part 2: Delays and an unsettling statement from the OceanGate CEO". Travel Weekly. Archived from the original on 23 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  46. ^ Bella, Timothy (23 June 2023). "Titan CEO spoke of 'discount' parts, journalist invited on submersible says". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 26 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  47. ^ Noble, Breana (23 June 2023). "Metro Detroit man reveals details of his own Titan dive to Titanic". The Detroit News. OceanGate invited him in spring 2021 to a test drive of the Titan. Wortman brought Josh Clarke, a friend and advanced scuba diver, to come with him. They tested the submersible at 500 feet around a sunken fishing vessel in the Possession Sound
  48. ^ Noble, Breana (23 June 2023). "Metro Detroit man reveals details of his own Titan dive to Titanic". The Detroit News. I walked away saying, 'OK, this is a legitimate company trying to push boundaries in the deep ocean.'" Wortman applied to be a "mission specialist.
  49. ^ Finley, Ben (24 June 2023). "Discovery Channel camera operator who rode on the missing Titan sub 2 years ago sensed trouble: 'I 100% knew this was going to happen.'". The Associated Press. Fortune.
  50. ^ a b c d e Pogue, David (27 June 2023). "What I Learned on a Titanic Sub Expedition". New York. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2023.
  51. ^ a b Shpigel, Ben; Victor, Daniel (22 June 2023). "Missing Titanic Submersible: All Five on Board Believed Dead After 'Catastrophic Implosion'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  52. ^ a b "Titanic sub timeline: when did it go missing and key events in search". Reuters. 23 June 2023. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  53. ^ Evans, Gareth; Gozzi, Laura (19 June 2023). "Titanic tourist submersible goes missing with search under way". BBC News. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  54. ^ Boyle, Alan (13 June 2019). "OceanGate puts off plans to dive to Titanic shipwreck this year, due to topside tangle". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  55. ^ Boyle, Alan (16 October 2020). "OceanGate gets set for dives to Titanic while overcoming the complications of COVID-19". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  56. ^ Thompson, Zac (10 November 2020). "You Can Take a Tiny Sub to the "Titanic" Shipwreck—for $125,000". Frommers. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  57. ^ a b "OceanGate's Titan at Oakland County Airport". Detroit News. 22 June 2023.
  58. ^ "OceanGate submersible tour in full swing". Oceanographic Magazine. No. 20.
  59. ^ Boyle, Alan (31 March 2021). "OceanGate selects its support ship for this summer's submersible trips to the Titanic". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  60. ^ McIntyre, Gordon (20 June 2023). "B.C. businessman Ron Toigo visited Titanic in same mini-sub now missing". The Vancouver Sun.
  61. ^ Boyle, Alan (21 August 2022). "OceanGate's explorers update their view of a tattered Titanic and the life around it". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  62. ^ Boyle, Alan (6 June 2022). "OceanGate ramps up the research for its second deep-sea expedition to the Titanic". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  63. ^ Guillén, Beatriz (22 June 2023). "Mexican youtuber who traveled on 'Titan' last year: 'I was aware that I was risking my life'". El Pais.
  64. ^ a b Weissmann, Arnie (22 June 2023). "Mission Titanic, Part 3: Trouble ahead, trouble behind". Travel Weekly. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  65. ^ Boyle, Alan (6 April 2023). "Icebergs ahead? OceanGate plans to get an early start on this year's Titanic dives". GeekWire. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
  66. ^ Weissmann, Arnie (20 June 2023). "Mission Titanic, Part 1: Preparing to dive". Travel Weekly. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 22 June 2023.
  67. ^ "Submersible bound for Titanic goes missing". CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. 19 June 2023. Archived from the original on 28 June 2023. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  68. ^ "Titanic tourist submersible goes missing with search under way". BBC News. 19 June 2023. Archived from the original on 19 June 2023. Retrieved 19 June 2023.
  69. ^ Liebermann, Oren; Britzky, Haley (20 June 2023). "US military moving military and commercial assets to help submersible search efforts". CNN. Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 20 June 2023.
  70. ^ Victor, Daniel; Jiménez, Jesus; Bogel-Burroughs, Nicholas (22 June 2023). "Missing Titanic Submersible: 'Catastrophic Implosion' Likely Killed 5 Aboard Submersible". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 22 June 2023. Retrieved 23 June 2023.
  71. ^ "What caused the implosion of the Titan sub?". The Indian Express. 25 June 2023. Retrieved 29 June 2023.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Titan (submersible).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Titan_(submersible)&oldid=1253405224"