User talk:Gwernol
Hello. Welcome to my Talk page. Feel free to leave a comment below. Please sign your comments by putting ~~~~ at the end. Thanks, Gwernol.
- /Archive 1 April 2005 through early March 2006
My RfA
Thanks for supporting my RFA. I really appreciated the show of support and all the kind words from so many great Wikipedians. I hope I live up to them! -- Vary | Talk 17:41, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
My RFA
|
Thanks for participating in my RfA. It passed with a final tally of 98/13/10, just two short of making WP:100. If you need my help with anything, don't hesitate to ask. |
Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about egreggrious, is there a way to resubmit?
I didn't know that I deleted that when I tried to change the article. Is there a way to resubmit the article, it poses no threat to anyone. User:SwassFloridian
Why is Max Plank attracting so much vandalism?
Seems an odd article to vandalize. Thanks for the rvv. Robert A.West (Talk) 22:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Large Scale Online
I have put the link back which I orignally changed-I was trying to correct it, as it didn't work, but clearly I bodged-I thought the two sites were the same. There was only a spelling error originally. Its on Garden railway. John 21:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Why did you delete information about this online magazine? If you would look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LSOL.com you will see that the discussion has been had that this is a OK link. If you deleted LSOL.com link you will need to remove the link to Garden Railways Magazine and Kalmbach as they are also profit business. Just becuase a business does not kill trees to provide information to people does not make it a resouce like a printed magazine? Please replace the information you delete on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_railway page.
I've temporarily sprotected User talk:207.69.137.8, and will keep an eye on it before lifting. Thanks, — xaosflux Talk/CVU 04:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Haruson
I strongly support your deletion notice on the Clan Haruson page - I'd been wondering what to do about other pages with a Haruson theme. The writer seems to be very interested in certain ideas which are probably "original research". I'm also concerned about the Haruson, Praedicatum and Duke of Britain pages which seem full of material which would not be supported by historians, genealogists etc. - but as a newish user, am uncertain what would be the best thing to do about this. (These ideas have been added to several other pages as well.) Any suggestions? --HJMG 08:20, 18 March 2006 (UTC) PS Have you seen this? Possibly it's not exactly a hoax, more a personal "quest"?
I've now found the discussion on the articles for deletion page - and will add something there. HJMG 08:50, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, I left the blank article, and it has alreday been deleted: [1]. Is it possible to redirect to this article? mhunter 02:10, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
yay
Yay Luigi30 (Ταλκ το mε) 04:27, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Note
| Hello, I noticed you edited a Hip Hop related article. If you wish you can join the new Hip Hop Wikiproject. Thanks for your time. Tutmosis 22:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC) |
Jean Baptiste Sipido
When I speedyed it I wrote {{delete|importance}} I did not know that i needed to explain it furthur thanks Betacommand 11:55, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hi! I actually just checked a few databases to which I have access and looked him up in the Biographie nationale when I visited the library for other reasons. I'm not really interested in doing any further work on Sipido at this point. I hope somebody else will check the references I found and improve the article. Tupsharru 14:24, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- thanks :) Betacommand 20:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Can't spell rabbit
Check out the article from the same guy at Round buildings. Apparently he thinks the large monument at Salisbury is called "stone hedge". I sincerely hope this is nobody over 12, though I have run into high school seniors whose literacy is that marginal. Fan1967 19:32, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Alton Towers and a link...
Not sure what happened to the equipment at Alton Towers.. Please reply to ShakespeareFan00 (Forget to login)
You may also be interested in: http://ukrailways.wikicities.com/wiki/Main_Page
Cross seeding of that Wiki with WikiProject Trains would seem to be advantageous ;-)
You've got several options availible, and asking for advice from someone disinterested in the artilce (like me) is a good start. Without knowing any of the history, here's some options:
- Try a compromise that leaves the link, but puts forth your message (e.g. LargeScaleOnline.com website (subscription site) ).
- You could try a less formal mediation project, such as the Mediation Cabal
- Try to gain consensus on the talk page, you may wish to put a NPOV statement about in a talk page section, and advertise it to prior editors with a npov talk page message (e.g. Your comments on article would be appreciated). If you do this, be sure to send the message to at least ALL NON-ANONS, not just to ones that may have agreeded with your editing in the past.
As for WP:EL while this is policy, it's one of the weaker policies (e.g. noone gets banned for it unelss they are an outright spammer) and if the link provides some free content that is related to the article, it may be worthy of inclusion. If only a certain page of the site has the content, change the URI to go directly to the file/page. — xaosflux Talk 01:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- No problem, have a good %timeofday%! — xaosflux Talk 01:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Welcoming new users
Just a reminder that when you're welcoming new users (like User:Ajay Srinivas or User:Phantom Llama, for instance), don't forget to sign your comments, in case the newcomers would like to contact you, or find out who you are! Also, the welcome message should go on the user's talk page, not their user page. Otherwise though, good show for taking to time to do some newbie welcoming - cheers! --PeruvianLlama(spit) 06:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Shah Mahmoud Hanifi
Sorry, that whole post was not directed at you. Part of it was outrage that people would delete the entry without even considering the information. Considering the Professor Criteria, Dr. Hanifi is obviously more than qualified to be placed on wikipedia. Looking at his honors and the projects he is working on are extraordinary for any professor. Warnerhw 01:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)Warnerhw
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage!
Hello, Gwernol; I just wanted to thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage (with amazing speed, I might add!). So, I present to you a flower! — Webdinger BLAH | SZ 06:43, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Me too. I have pissed a vandal off by getting an admin to indefinetly block him. This guy is vandalizes the page about the very school he goes to!!! (I go to the same school; in process on finding out who he is. :P) Typer525 03:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Vandal block
I went ahead and blocked the vandal, so don't worry about it. I saw no evidence that he had stopped, just that he hadn't done it again right then and there. A 24 hour block will, hopefully, cement the point. Let me know if it doesn't. Just wanted you to know. I take vandalism much more seriously than others. Just wanted you to know.Gator (talk) 17:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I see you deleted this article in response to my speedy deletion notice. Thanks, but.. could you restore the article? I have been discussing this with the author on the talk page and I think this needs to go to AfD given the author's objection. I expect that the AfD will result in the re-deletion of the page, but I want to give its author a fair chance to improve his article. Thanks, Gwernol 21:35, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, it was Neutrality who deleted Johnson, Christopher Amos. I deleted "Johnson, Christopher Amos", a mis-titled and shorter version of the article. Please let me know if you have trouble contacting Neutrality. Owen× ☎ 21:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Egm NGR AfD reply
I'm not under the impression that people go through every article and decided to 'pick on' EGM NGR, I know how Wikipedia works. I didn't want to go further into useless arguments on the page, but I know that the article was originally nominated (right away, I'll point out, the article hadn't existed more than 10 minutes) for deletion by someone who dislikes NGR and wanted to frustrate us, knowing we couldn't yet find what was needed to pass WP:WEB. However, why replies have been so intensely against the article existing is beyond me, especially, as the list was kind of a point of, there are so many articles which fail the same notability tests that you wouldn't think editors would react as if they had seen some sort of abomination. The "false air of justifiability" comment was just further wondering aloud on this subject. Nobody likes to nominate established articles for AfD, just help if the ball's already rolling. I believe if the article had been hidden from those who hate the board and had grown to the size of other Category: Internet Forum articles, there'd be a much, much stronger chance that nobody unaffiliated with EGM NGR in any way would have tried to delete it. Now that the deletion seems imminent, we've basically given up on upgrading the article unless given a second chance. I do understand Wikipedia, and I do understand this: it's the unwritten politics of what does and does not get brought to attention that decide what stays and what goes, especially since a good third or more of the content here isn't deserving of a page but isn't findable for objections unless you were searching exactly for it. -- Viewdrix 01:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
re: catmore
I reverted most of the edits because this anon user did in fact add {{catmore}} to a bunch of arbitrary pages, without any regard to whether or not the article link generated from the template exists, or if {{catmore1}} should have been used instead. Therefore, it looks more this person was spamming pages. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Prod and Speedy
By all means tag a 'prod'ed article for speedy deletion, if it meats the WP:CSD. But please do not remove the prod tag when you do so. If the reviewing admin rejects your speedy nomination, it is better that the thing still can be deleted by prod. If the admin speedies it, the fact that there is still a prod tag on it will not matter. So nothing lost by leaving them on, and much gained if the speedy is rejected. --Doc ask? 01:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
DeltaOne
Thanks for helping me, I will try to do as you suggested.
Gwernol
Gwernol I'm am leaving this one alone not because it isn't a racist term but because isolated statements shouldn't define someone. 132.241.246.111 03:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
You're welcome. Lulu is fortunate that I grew up in Texas, and was force-fed a lot of Hee Haw as a child. I just happened to recognize the name. Joyous | Talk 03:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thanks...
...for three things:
- your recent excellent work on Ontology (computer science)
- supporting me on the "Ann Coulter is racist" thing
- reverting vandalism to my userpage!
We need more Wikipedians like you. :-) dbtfztalk 05:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
you're welcome
...and happy editing. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
I was going to make another header but Antandrus has it covered quite nicely for me :) -- Tawker 05:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. :) --
Rory09605:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Sipido again
I did expand the article after all, but there is still much more that could be written. Anyway, I noticed that the railway station where the assassination attempt took place doesn't have an article, and since you are apparently into trains... Tupsharru 07:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Moved from user page
Sorry to edit your site, but I didn't no where to else to protest as my entry of "Isaac Daniel Ling" has been deleted. Isaac is a real person and those things have been reported in news articles about him. No joke. Please restore the page. www.townsvillebulletin.com has a few articles on him as well as other newspapers, try the search feature. —This unsigned comment was added by Boon75 (talk • contribs) .
DaGizza's RfA
Hi Gwernol, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. GizzaChat © 11:49, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
User:Murderous
No problem, glad to help. And way to keep cool and respond appropriately in the face of some serious provocation! -- Vary | Talk 15:39, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism to user page
Gwernol said: Thanks for catching the vandalism to my user page and reverting it. Always appreciated. Best, Gwernol
No worries. During my vandal fighting I often find it easy to use IP-only User page diffs to find out who has been vandalizing individual user and user talk pages. It's always a useful tool. Thank you. Bobo. 06:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk archive
No problem, it happens all the time. (Look at the deletion log for Archive 1) I actually messed up myself and moved it into your userpage/archive 1, luckily there were some admins online in #vandalism-en-wp :o --Rory096 00:19, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
distance templates
These are a bad idea. They are not necessary, since information 2'3" is always goin to be 686mm. All the templates will do is place unnecessary strain on the server. That is unless of course you subst: them, but that obviates the point of replacing vanilla text with fancy templates in the first place. — Dunc|☺ 17:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism reprimand
You recently reprimanded this IP for vandalism on 3/30. Specifically, you said something like "stop adding nonsense." However, I can't find anything in the IPs history that I would consider nonsense. Can you point it out to me? 208.20.220.72 18:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thanks
..for fixing up my 'test1' warning on Heffer. I was in a rush and blundered it(both location and lacking sig). thanks for the cover 'n' cleanup! Take Care! Anger22 00:16, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Based on the links you provided, I have undeleted this page. If you are able to expand it to the point that it no longer appears to be a vanity page please do so. Normally I would have spent more time checking into a page like thia, but with the flood of hoax submissions currently being received in honor of April Fools Day time is limited. --Allen3 talk 01:32, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Certainty principle
Hi, while i second your effort - i invite you to read the article and you'll see that . It has not peer reviewed but that isn't what wikipedia is about nor ever will as more and more people join. Wikipedia differs in that everything that is somehow worthwhile for a large enough number of people should get and stay in. Thus we have thousands of articles devoted to software and of course to other scientific fields. Please discuss this with others, as well as how productive it is to set deletion marks. This article certainly needs to be polished and revised but the content is correct. If you cannot judge that yourself then i wonder why you contribute to such articles.
I've noticed quite a lot of admins that set deletion marks at will without actually understanding the content (no not regarding my pages). Concentrate on the new pages, and possible vandalism instead or contribute to articles with good will.
If also contacted the author to get permission right to post it, and it has been elaborated with a peer and review of his professor, as noted in the paper. But it is a shame alone that i have to justify myself instead of inferring the meaning of an article on your own.
With each deletion request, that is unfounded or doubtfull at best you cost others precious time, which is also the sole reason to write all this, in hoping you rethink your attitude.
best regardsSlicky 16:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi. I am familiar with original research. You have to differentiate between what someone devised and wanna publish through wikipedia and between a decent paper that it . It is the uncertainty principle viewed from the other side if you so want, resulting in an interesting perspective. If you would be more familiar with the topic, you would see how wrong it is to question this at all because that would be like disputing the uncertainty principle, which .
Moreover i AM not about requests for deletion, but i strongly oppose users that do not really know in a particular case whether or not a certain article fits the Wikipedia rules and thus simply places tags for hell to come on some article. In that case IT IS MORE THAN ENOUGH to just add a new topic in the discussion such as most more considerate users do. If you don't understand this, well so be it. There are millions and each ones opinion counts along with guidlines and certain few rules. This is just littering of articles, and i am sure you too are not interested in constantly reading and printing articles which are tagged with more wiki-internal remarks than actual content.
You are welcome to actually clean up, contribute AND VALIDATE articles first before tagging them with unnecessary remarks RIGHT IN THE ARTICLE CONTEXT. Whilst i realize my tone is quite harsh try to share this attitude with others. Or use more expressive tags, there are lots of others!
Here's something you might just fancy: Rachel haircut
OR At the very least once again don't contribute in any way to articles you are inapt too judge (which i really don't know, but oviously haven't read the paper), just as i don't add anything to topics i know too little about.
regardsSlicky 19:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Hi, first of all i never made the assumption that you do not know about the uncertainty principle (let alone from the fact that is hopefully taught in highschool nowadays) but i considered that you may not have written the paper.
In the end you certainly aren't wrong to bring in a request for deletion - though are about the emphasis you put on it by using a tag taking a third of the whole page. I think we settled that issue.
At last as far as publication goes (which was also one of my concerns) the author noted: "3. In Russia, unlike in the West, we have journals that do
not do so. But the situation here is much worse, because those journals are controlled by local "science mafia", which accepts for publication papers only of "appropriate" people.
" You may research that on your own if you feel inclined i admit i did not, however heard similar stories from africa etc. Be aware that the paper came out last month, and the publication cylce is several months. Moreover it is not of such fundamental importance to qualify it as research, it is just a correct take of the uncertainty principle from another perspective from which undergrads could profit. I encourage any scientific effort, and thus i admit was quite biased at the beginning of our discussion, for which i apologize. best regards and keep up your interest into physics Slicky 19:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Warning users
Thanks for the info, I got acquainted with this.
PS. Sorry for the late answer. Jacek Kendysz 13:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Out of Line
You have my apologies. My actions were out of line. I was simply trying to add a well used slang term for protestants in the mid-west. I was some what offended by your extremely formal methods, and took out my anger in an inappropriate way. My bad — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.181.221.145 (talk • contribs)
Thank You!
Thank you for recognizing the vandalism over at New Testament Christian Churches of America, Inc and reverting the page back. You rock!!! Hanako 21:56, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
Re: New locomotive manufacturers
Thanks for your invitation to join the WikiProject Trains. I have seen this and felt a bit diffident about it. I don't have the time or the inclination to engage in discussion of the minutiea, such as whether it should be Derby works (as if that were the only one) or Derby railway works. Or whether it should be Derby station, Derby railway station or Derby Midland railway station - although I have been known to lurk. I particularly haven't the energy for slanging matches with the more aggressive contibutors. I am working outwards from my original page List of early British private locomotive manufacturers. I am trying to head the articles with the official name of the companies, in most cases. After some thought, for instance I have moved "Hudswell Clarke" to "Hudswell Clarke and Company" On the other hand I've left "Vulcan Foundry", although it could lead to ambiguity since it was a very common name at the time. I have problems with Dick, Kerr & Co., especially dates, and the relationship with Kerr Stuart. The title I gave for Falcon Works was the one I was going to use for the article when I got round to it, though I could of course add a pipe to the link in the Kerr Stuart article. Many thanks. Best wishes. Chevin 09:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the warnings, please let the other Wikipedia folk know as well. We are a K-12 school district in Rhode Island and evidently some of our students are a bit overzealous. Our entire district is nat'ed behind a single IP address. I will have a notice sent out regarding being nice on Wikipedia. If you have any info you can point me to regarding public schools and Wikipedia I'd appreciate it. Thank you. Mike Marseglia, Network Administrator, Foster-Glocester Regional Schools.
My RfA
|
Hello Gwernol: Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 77/3/0. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please let me know. Prodego talk 01:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
Re: Traxxas revert
Good job, dude. You caught that pretty quickly.
Justin
Hey, I noticed your questioning the truthfulness of the Bollix article. Why would you do such a thing if you are not Irish and would have absolutely no idea of about Irish curse words. Why don't you look it up on the internet next time to prove your doubts wrong before you go jumping the gun and questioning the truthfulness of genuine articles!
Sexyeamo
Yes, that is the mis-conception Gwernol. That bollix is simply an alternative spelling of the word bollocks. That is what I have encountered most of the time when I speak to non-Irish people as well. But it is also not true. Why don't you ask an Irish friend, that at least would be a little more mature than wanting to delete a true article just because you're upset that the word bollix is not simply an alternative spelling of the word bollocks. Just remember Gwernol, this is not a game you should use your position of power with a little more humility, what's important is the truth not your ego.
Good! Just be aware that sometimes things are not what they seem and the meaning of words changes all the time. In Ireland bollix means male genitalia and is a singular noun. The origins of the word may be from the term bollocks but it has evolved in Ireland for good or for bad and has a distinctly different meaning to the original there now therefore I believe it warrants its own page. The ironic thing is even some Irish people have forgotten the Irish meaning of the word because of the exposure of British culture. Hence we have our current problem where most people associate the two as the same when in fact they are fairly unique. It's the same thing which has occurred with the term Ulster. Everybody in Briain and the rest of the English speaking world seem to think that Northern Ireland is Ulster when in fact Northern Ireland is just six of the nine counties that make up Ulster. But things like that get easily forgotten when one culture is more dominant than another in our modern multimedia world.
Sexyeamo
Sorry about overwriting your comment
I was more upset that you didn't subst the unsigned tag, actually. ;-) --Rory096 23:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk page
Thanks for seeing and reverting that. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Adminship
I've only been active since late January, so I doubt I'd accept a nom for another couple of months (plus I won't be on the internet for 7 weeks this summer). How about you? I was going to find your RfA to see how long you had been on WP when you became an admin and... it wasn't there. (Template:RFA cliche1 anyone?) --Rory096 23:55, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Vadalize?
What did I vandalize you fool? ya admin are lyke Bush alwayz keeping us Niggers down! now tell me what I did, so I can try ta get your admin removed. —This unsigned comment was added by Thousandsons (talk • contribs) .
I apologize...
I am very sorry for having darker skin, please learn to forgive, me. —This unsigned comment was added by Thousandsons (talk • contribs) .
Not vandalism
My last edit was not vandalism. I removed incorrect information that was contradictory to the rest of the section. 65.185.73.251 23:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Still not vandalism
I didn't remove the "majority of the article," I removed one incorrect sentence. 65.185.73.251 23:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
Regarding the article JKop, which you tagged for speedy deletion with the reason "it is an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)", I wanted you to know that I have removed the speedy deletion tag. This article does not qualify for speedy deletion because the article claims nine single and four album releases, which is an assertion of importance. If you still want the article to be deleted, please use the WP:AFD process. Thanks! Stifle 00:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Esperanza!
Welcome, Gwernol, to Esperanza, the Wikipedia member association! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.
Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.
In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.
I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee comprised of KnowledgeOfSelf, JoanneB, FireFox and Titoxd. The next set of elections will be in April, and I would be glad to see you vote, or even consider running for a position.
If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!
IM SORRY FOR MAKING FUN OF YOU
I JUST DELETED SOME THINGS THAT I REGRET SAYING SO IM SORRY FOR THAT. YOU LOOK LIKE UR ACTUALLY A NICE GUY SO IM SORRY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emstu10 (talk • contribs) 03:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Must you type in all uppercase letters? It's called shouting, please ease up on your Caps Lock key. —
nathanrdotcom (T • C • W) 04:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Revert to Cuckhold article
You made a revert that erased all of my changes on the Cuckold article. My changes were relatively minor, and were intended to reduce or eliminate the complaint that the article was racially biased. I also remove the "toyboy" term, which was used innacurately. (And the term is more commonly "Boytoy") but still should not have been used in that context anyway in order to be accurate.
I will revert back to my edition after some period of time, or re-institute the meaningful changes if you don't want to respond to this and explain.
My assumption is that you are a good person who thinks, for some reason, that you are fixing vandalism to the page, as you are one of the people who monitors recent changes. Maybe sometimes you are overzealous about that? Thanks, -- Atomaton, April 2006.
Revert was Reverted by you, thanks. -- Atomaton
Speedy deletion 2
I noticed that you tagged the page List of concierge service companies for speedy deletion with the reason "spamvert, incorrect title, unsourced". However, "spamvert, incorrect title, unsourced" is not currently one of our criteria for speedy deletion, so I have removed the speedy deletion tag. You can use WP:PROD if you still want the article to be deleted. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 15:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Ah, no worries: I agreed and had clicked 'delete' and was about to confirm when something rang a bell and I stopped. The article survived by about half a second... only to be deleted under CSD-A7 anyway 2 hours later by someone else! ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 18:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you
 |
Thank you! Hello Gwernol. Thank you for your support in my RfA! It passed with a final tally of 91/3/5. I am quite humbled and pleased by the community's show of confidence in me. If you need help or just want to talk, let me know. Cheers! -- Fang Aili 說嗎? |
My RfA
Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 19:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for catching the vandalism of my user page. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 17:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
User needs blocked, third vandalism
The user User:24.62.181.236 is vandalising again. I don't know who to tell or how to tell them, you have warned him before so I'm asking you. Sorry I don't know what to do...See here. Thanks, Bourgeoisdude 21:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
The Archie Comics Universe
Hello, Gwernol! I'm RobScholar, new at Wikipedia.
I was trying to edit a page dedicated to the proposed fictional character Harry S. Fulmonovich (steady boyfriend lover to Saranda Yates Jones) in Archie Comics. I operate a website called The Archie Comics Universe at [2]—my website has a section dedicated to Harry & Saranda that people do enjoy.
I regret to learn that my first few attempts to do a Wikipedia entry page for this fictional (although proposed) character got deleted... How do I notify that this Harry is a proposed character for Archie Comics in an acceptable manner? In the article summary, perhaps?! (My Wikipedia page on Saranda Yates Jones got accepted, and added to the articles.)
How's this for a summary: This article is about a proposed fictional character based on a story in Archie Comics—please visit The Archie Comics Universe [3] for more information.
RobScholar 05:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)=RobScholar