Jump to content

Reverse-contrast typefaces

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Blythwood (talk | contribs) at 06:06, 6 November 2016 (link). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Reverse-contrast "Italian" type in an 1828 specimen book by the George Bruce company of New York.[1] Shown below it is a "fat face" design, a type also popular in early 19th century printing.[2][3] Both typefaces are very bold, but the fat face's thick lines are the verticals as normal and the Italian's are the horizontals.[a]

A reverse-contrast letterform is a typeface or custom lettering in which the stress is reversed from the norm: instead of the vertical lines being the same width or thicker than horizontals, which is normal in Latin-alphabet writing and especially printing, the horizontal lines are the thickest.[5][6] The result is a dramatic effect, in which the letters seem to have been printed the wrong way round. Originally intended as attention-grabbing novelty display designs, modern font designer Peter Biľak, who has created a design in the genre, has described them as "a dirty trick to create freakish letterforms that stood out."[7]

Reverse-contrast letters are rarely used for body text, being more used in display applications such as headings and posters, in which the unusual structure may be particularly eye-catching.[8] They were particularly common in the mid- to late nineteenth century, and have been revived occasionally since then. They could be considered as slab serif designs because of the thickened serifs, and are often characterised as part of that genre.

Particularly in recent times, the reverse-contrast effect has been extended to other kinds of typeface, such as sans-serif designs and designs more suitable for extended text passages.[9] The design style, also known as "reverse-stroke" or "horizontal-stress", has no connection to reverse-contrast printing, where light text is printed on a black background.[10]

Historical background

See also: Didone typefaces
Diagonal angle of stress in the typeface Centaur, based on 1470s Venetian printing. The narrowest part of the stroke is at top left/bottom right, so the axis is diagonal.

Since the earliest days of printing in roman (or antiqua) type, it has been the norm for the vertical lines to generally be of the same width, or thicker than the horizontals, sometimes at an angle mimicking script written by a quill pen. However, from the arrival of roman type around 1475 to the late eighteenth century, relatively little development in letter design took place, as most fonts of the period were intended for body text, and they stayed relatively similar in design.[b]

A Didone type, Bodoni, from the late eighteenth century. The contrast has been increased and the axis of the contrast made more purely vertical.
A conventional slab-serif typeface, Rockwell.[c] The serifs have been thickened and the contrast is minimal.

Towards the end of the eighteenth century, printers developed what are now called transitional and then Didone types. These typefaces had a far greater amount of stroke contrast than before, with the difference in stroke width much greater than in earlier types.[d][12][13][14] The resulting, daringly slender horizontals and serif details could show off the increasingly high quality of paper and printing technology of the period.[15][16] In addition, these typefaces had a strictly vertical stress: without exception, the vertical lines were thicker than the horizontals, creating a much more geometric and modular design.

A second major development of the period was the arrival of the printed poster and increasing use of signpainting and printing for publicity and advertising material, for example in newspaper adverts. This caused a desire to develop eye-catching new types of letters.[17] As a result, new styles of painted letters and "display type" began to appear, such as sans-serif and then sans-serif letters around the same time, which were not just larger versions of traditional serif letters.[18][19] Presumably to be more eye-catching, these new styles of letter were often extremely bold.[2][3][20]

The first reverse-contrast types

Hansard's 1825 gallery of ultra-bold 'monstrosities!!!' The typefaces are blackletter, slab serif and the 'Italian' type at the bottom.[21]
A document printed in 1836, showing Didone (body text), 'Italian' (the word 'proceedings') and early sans-serif fonts. The 'Italian' type is Caslon's Italian or a close copy. The document was printed in Michigan, showing how far the Italian style had penetrated around 15 years after its appearance in London.

The earliest known reverse contrast types date to about 1821. They were created H.W. Caslon company in London, presumably as a parody of Didone typefaces and lettering of the period.[5][7][22][23][24][25] Nicolete Gray, quoting Francis Thibaudeau, wrote in Nineteenth Century Ornamented Typefaces that the style appeared (presumably as lettering) in France slightly earlier during the First French Empire (1804-1815) without giving a specific example.[26] The typeface had very thick serifs, so the gap between the serifs and the main strokes making up the letters was very small, as can be seen on letters such as 'E' and 'S'. To make the effect even more shocking, the thicker line on the 'A' was moved from its normal position on the right to the left, making a letter that seems to be the wrong way round. A caps-only design, steel master punches for the typeface (perhaps not the very first) survive in the collection of the St Bride Library, London.[5] Writing for Print magazine, Paul Shaw described it as "one of the most bizarre slab serif types of the 19th century."[27] Barnes and Schwartz describe it as "perverse [but] done with sureness and confidence."[5]

The Caslon company called the type Italian. Nicolete Gray has concluded that the style was "probably" Italian in origin, although it was certainly very common for display types to be given unusual, exotic names as a brand; for example, "Egyptian" was often applied to sans (and later slab) serif types of the period and "Antique" to slab-serifs.[18][26] Reverse-contrast designs do slightly resemble capitalis rustica Roman writing, although this may be a coincidence.[28] They were also called Egyptian.[7][29]

Within a few years of their introduction the printer and social reformer Thomas Curson Hansard had described them as "typographic monstrosities":

Fashion and Fancy commonly frolic from one extreme to another. To the razor-edged fine lines and serifs of [Didone] type...a reverse [of sans and slab serifs] has succeeded...the property of which is, that the strokes which form the letters are all of one uniform thickness! After this, who would have thought that further extravagance could have been conceived? It remains, however, to be stated, that the ingenuity of one founder has contrived a type in which the natural shape is reversed, by turning all the serifs and fine strokes into fats, and the fats into leans. Oh! sacred shades of [eminent typefounders of the past] Moxon and van Dijck, of Baskerville and Bodoni! What would ye have said of the typographic monstrosities here exhibited [shown], which Fashion in our age has produced?[21]

In contrast, Walter Tracy described the design in 1986 as "a jeu d’esprit, not meant to be judged in conventional aesthetic terms."[30][31]

In any case, reverse-contrast types rapidly spread to the United States. The George Bruce company of New York displays Caslon's Italian or a close copy in its 1828 specimen book.[1]

Peter Biľak's Karloff is a sophisticated revival designed partly through mathematical interpolation. Biľak's group digitally inverted the contrast of a conventional Didone font: this allowed Biľak to create a normal and matching reverse-contrast font, together with a low-contrast slab serif design all with the same basic structure, named Karloff Positive, Negative and Neutral with an upper and lower case.[7][25][32][33] Village Type's Arbor like Karloff adds a lower-case, while Match & Kerosene's Slab Sheriff is caps-only, with a 'A' featuring the conventional stress on the right.[34][35] Other unreleased revivals have reportedly been made for private use by Paul Barnes and Justin Howes.[31][36]

French Clarendon

See also: French Clarendon type
French Clarendon type (top) compared to a conventional Clarendon design.
Original French Clarendon wood type, showing its highly condensed design.
French Clarendon type on a 1914 poster from Ljubljana.

In the mid to late nineteenth century, it became popular for type foundries to offer reverse-contrast variants of Clarendon, a popular slab serif type genre, especially in the United States, creating large block serifs at the top and bottom of the letter. This was known as French Clarendon type.[37][38] The advantage of French Clarendon type was that it allowed very large, eye-catching serifs while the letters remained narrow, suiting the desire of poster-makers for condensed but very bold type.[39] French Clarendon types are often associated with wild-west printing and seen on circus posters and wanted notices in western movies. In fact, the style was used in many parts of the world during this period. The style is sometimes called 'circus letter'.[8][37] The practice was less popular with Arts and Crafts movement printers: DeVinne commented in 1902 that "To be hated, it needs but to be seen."[29] In Europe the style was sometimes called Italienne, matching the Caslon name. In contrast to the original Caslon type, which features horizontals in the middle of the letter (like the cross-bar in the H) that are often but not always thick, French Clarendon types have the only thick lines at the top and botton, and all inner horizontals thin.[28]

Although Bodoni and Didot fuelled their designs with the calligraphic practices of their time, they created new forms that collided with typographic tradition and unleashed a strange new world, where the structural attributes of the letter-serif and stem, thick and thin strokes, vertical and horizontal stress-would be subject to bizarre experiments...Fonts of astonishing height, width and depth appeared: expanded, contracted, shadowed, inlined, fattened, faceted and floriated. Serifs abandoned their role as finishing details to become independent architectural structures, and the vertical stress of traditional letters canted in new directions.[40]

Ellen Lupton

French Clarendon designs were often created in wood type, used for large-print letters on posters. The University of Texas at Austin, which maintains a large archive of American wood type, reports that the first known wood French Clarendon type was issued by William Hamilton Page in 1865.[41][42] Their collection shows the many other names used for wood type which display reverse-contrast characteristics, including 'Celtic', 'Belgian', 'Aldine' and 'Teutonic', as well as Italian again and sometimes 'Tuscan' or 'Etruscan' also.[43][44][e] (At the time a separation did not fully exist between genre names and typeface names, so these may be the names of individual types, or if they proved popular the name of the subgenre they created.[18][45]) At least one sans-serif typeface with reverse contrast was developed in this period.[46]

A variety of more modern adaptations have been made of the style, including Robert Harling's Playbill (1938) and more recently Adrian Frutiger's Westside, URW++'s Zirkus and Bitstream's P. T. Barnum.[28][38][47][48]

Writing on why he created a design in the genre, Frutiger, a designer better-known for his work in the sans-serif genre, commented:

As a type designer I wanted to draw something in every style. It's a matter of professional pride...I found the existing Italiennes with their big feet too harsh and strict...the fine curves in the serifs give Westside its own expression. A text set in this typeface looks like a weaving pattern...I really enjoyed drawing it. For one thing it was great fun.[28]

Frutiger decided to return to the Caslon type's pattern of all horizontals being thick apart from those on 'a' and 'e', which he felt could not be fitted into this system.

Modern reverse-contrast types

Reverse contrast lettering on tiles at a chocolaterie at The Hague, Netherlands. Date unknown.

Because of their quirky, hand-made design, lighter versions of the style were popular for uses such as film posters in the 1950s and 60s.[49]

David Jonathan Ross speaking on the history of reverse-contrast letters

A well-reviewed modernisation of the style has been Trilby by David Jonathan Ross, who has written and lectured on the history of the genre.[50][51] Released by Font Bureau, it is reminiscent of Clarendon revivals from the 1950s. It attempts to adapt the style to use in a much wider range of settings, going so far as to be usable for text.[52][53][54][55] Bigfish is another modernisation inspired by lettering, in which the thickest stress is at the top.[56] Some other adaptations have preserved the concept but changed genre, presenting sans-serif or script typefaces in the same style.[9][49][50][57] Antique Olive of 1966 by Roger Excoffon is a well-known sans-serif design with subtle reverse-contrast aspects, particularly visible in its ultra-bold 'Nord' style, while Signo is an award-winning sans-serif reverse-contrast design from 2015.[58][59]

Notes

  1. ^ The fat face design is Elephant by Matthew Carter, a modern revival of the genre.[4]
  2. ^ This was not the only way in which fonts could appear different, however: differences in x-height, spacing, condensation and colour on the page can make body text fonts look different in design even if individual letters are not that different.
  3. ^ Rockwell is actually from the 1930s, but early slab-serif typefaces were very similar.[11]
  4. ^ Didone types were at the time called 'modern' for their sophisticated image; the name has fallen from use as they have become less common in body text from around the end of the nineteenth century.
  5. ^ The defining feature of 'Tuscan' fonts is that they have diamond points protruding from the letter and/or ornate serifs, but some were reverse-contrast also.[40]

References

  1. ^ a b A Specimen Book of Printing Types. New York: George Bruce. 1828. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
  2. ^ a b Kennard, Jennifer. "The Story of Our Friend, the Fat Face". Fonts in Use. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
  3. ^ a b Phinney, Thomas. "Fat Faces". Graphic Design and Publishing Centre. Retrieved 10 August 2015.
  4. ^ "New Faces in Washington". Font Bureau. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  5. ^ a b c d Barnes & Schwarz. "Type Tuesday". Eye magazine. Retrieved 10 August 2015.
  6. ^ Abel, Naomi. "The Chosen Contrast". Alphabettes. Retrieved 3 October 2016.
  7. ^ a b c d Biľak, Peter. "Beauty and Ugliness in Type design". I love typography. Retrieved 10 August 2015.
  8. ^ a b Lawson, Alexander (1990). Anatomy of a Typeface (1st ed.). Boston: Godine. pp. 321–323. ISBN 9780879233334.
  9. ^ a b Peters, Yves. "Fontlists: Reverse Contrast". Fontshop. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  10. ^ Helen Osborne (18 November 2012). Health Literacy From A to Z. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. p. 211. ISBN 978-1-4496-7734-3.
  11. ^ "Sentinel's Ancestors". Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Retrieved 14 August 2015.
  12. ^ Phinney, Thomas. "Transitional & Modern Type Families". Graphic Design & Publishing Center. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
  13. ^ De Jong, Cees W.; Purvis, Alston W.; Friedl, Friedrich (2005). Creative Type: A Sourcebook of Classical and Contemporary Letterforms. Thames & Hudson. p. 223. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ Hoefler, Jonathan. "Didot History". Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Retrieved 11 August 2015.
  15. ^ Meggs, Philip B.; Purvis, Alston W. (2006). "Graphic Design and the Industrial Revolution". History of Graphic Design. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. p. 122. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ Sutton, James; Sutton, Alan (1988). An Atlas of Typeforms. Wordsworth Editions. p. 59. ISBN 1-85326-911-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  17. ^ Eskilson, Stephen J. (2007). Graphic Design: A New History. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 25. ISBN 9780300120110.
  18. ^ a b c Frere-Jones, Tobias. "Scrambled Eggs & Serifs". Frere-Jones Type. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  19. ^ Nesbitt, Alexander (1998). The History and Technique of Lettering. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. pp. 158–161. ISBN 9780486402819.
  20. ^ Mosley, James (6 January 2007). The Nymph and the Grot, an Update. It became clear that in 1805 Egyptian letters were happening in the streets of London, being plastered over shops and on walls by signwriters, and they were astonishing the public, who had never seen letters like them and were not sure they wanted to.
  21. ^ a b Hansard, Thomas Curson (1825). Typographia: An Historical Sketch of the Origin and Progress of the Art of Printing. London: Baldwin, Cradock & Joy. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  22. ^ Barnes, Paul. "Twitter post". Twitter. Retrieved 1 August 2016. [Nicolete] Gray says it was Italian in origin (via France), though I've never seen French or Italian sources...I am unsure of the full story
  23. ^ Devroye, Luc. "Henry Caslon". Retrieved 10 August 2015.
  24. ^ Heller, Steven; Meggs, Philip B., eds. (2001). Texts on Type: Critical Writings on Typography. New York: Allworth Press. p. 71. ISBN 9781581150827. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  25. ^ a b Biľak, Peter. "Conceptual Type". Typotheque. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  26. ^ a b Gray, Nicolete (1976). Nineteenth-century Ornamented Typefaces. pp. 32–33.
  27. ^ Shaw, Paul. "Arbor, a Fresh Interpretation of Caslon Italian". Print. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
  28. ^ a b c d Frutiger, Osterer & Stamm (2014). Adrian Frutiger – Typefaces: The Complete Works. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 346–351. ISBN 9783038212607.
  29. ^ a b De Vinne, Theodore (1902). The Practice of Typography, Plain Printing Types (2nd ed.). New York: The Century Co. pp. 333–334. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  30. ^ Tracy, Walter (2003). Letters of Credit: A View of Type Design. Boston: David R. Godine. ISBN 9781567922400.
  31. ^ a b "Caslon's Italian by James Clough". Blue Pencil. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  32. ^ Shinn, Nick. "Karloff Review". Typographica. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  33. ^ "Karloff Positive". Typotheque. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
  34. ^ Sheldon, Alex. "Slab Sheriff". MyFonts. Match and Kerosene. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  35. ^ "Arbor". Village Type. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  36. ^ Barnes, Paul. "Caslon Italian". Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  37. ^ a b Provan, Archie; Lawson, Alexander S. (1983). 100 Type Histories. Vol. volume 1. Arlington, VA: National Composition Association. pp. 20–21. {{cite book}}: |volume= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  38. ^ a b "P.T. Barnum". MyFonts.
  39. ^ Challand, Skylar. "Know Your Type: Clarendon". IDSGN. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  40. ^ a b Lupton, Ellen. Thinking with Type. p. 23. ISBN 9781616890452.
  41. ^ Gomez-Palacio, Bryony; Vit, Armin (2012). Graphic Design Referenced: A Visual Guide to the Language, Applications, and History of Graphic Design. Gloucester, MA: Rockport. p. 124. ISBN 9781592537426. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |last-author-amp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  42. ^ "Antique Clarendon Type". Rob Roy Kelly American Wood Type Collection. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  43. ^ "Tuscan no. 132". Rob Roy Kelly American Wood Type Collection. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  44. ^ "Teutonic". Rob Roy Kelly American Wood Type Collection. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  45. ^ Kupferschmid, Indra. "Type Classifications". kupferschrift * (blog). Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  46. ^ "Gothic Bold". Rob Roy Kelly American Wood Type Collection. University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  47. ^ "Playbill". MyFonts. Linotype. Retrieved 11 October 2015.
  48. ^ "Westside". Linotype. Retrieved 12 September 2015.
  49. ^ a b Ross, David Jonathan. "Backasswards! (presentation)" (PDF). Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  50. ^ a b Ross, David Jonathan. "Backasswards!". Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  51. ^ Elnar, Rachel. "David Jonathan Ross Loves Contrast". Type Ed. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  52. ^ "Trilby". Font Bureau. Retrieved 13 August 2015.
  53. ^ Shaw, Paul. "Slab Happy: Trilby Reviewed". Print. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  54. ^ "My favourite fonts of 2009". i love typography. Retrieved 15 August 2015.
  55. ^ Papazian, Hrant. "Mønster". Typographica. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
  56. ^ Braden, Felix. "Floodfonts – Bigfish". Floodfonts. Retrieved 25 August 2015.
  57. ^ Larabie, Ray. "Sunday Evening". Typodermic. Retrieved 24 November 2015.
  58. ^ Peters, Yves. "Award: Signo". Fontshop. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
  59. ^ Jenkins & Mickel. "Aero". Village Type. Retrieved 23 October 2015.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reverse-contrast_typefaces&oldid=748079111"