Talk:Kyle Kulinski

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kyle dating Krystal Ball[edit]

Not sure I agree with this revert. The information is sourced to a secondary source, and the news is relevant. Krystal Ball has her own Wikipedia article and is a notable progressive commentator. Thoughts on restoring? –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Novem Linguae, is that a reliable source? She's a married woman, so WP:BLPGOSSIP applies. I'll elevate this to WP:BLP/N, but this has to stay out of the article for now. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No need to escalate to BLPN, I think we can hash it out here. I forgot that she was married, useful context, that's a good reason to investigate a bit more before allowing it. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, just saw the edits over at Krystal Ball. Since so many editors are involved and since you extended confirmed protected it, yeah, BLPN is probably a good idea. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, just based on one edit here, it could be dealt with here. But this is a bigger BLP issue for Ball than it is for Kulinski. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: You reverted edits which had secondary sources confirming the information and verified by another individual. Try reading the WP:BLPGOSSIP again. You only mentioned one secondary source at the WP:BLP/N and omitted this [1] regarding the marriage status. --NoMagicSpellstalk 06:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NoMagicSpells, I'm confident of my reading of BLPGOSSIP.. You consider those sources to be up to our BLP standards? Distractify says they don't know anything about marital status. That is gossip. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Muboshgu: Not knowing about the marital status is a correct and factual statement. --NoMagicSpellstalk 06:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is gossip on a sensitive WP:BLP issue. You don't have to keep pinging me. I'm signing off for the night anyway. – Muboshgu (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subscriber count[edit]

If you go to the editing page, you can see that his subscriber account is set to "1 million," so why does the Wikipedia article say "998,000"? PiratePablo (talk) 02:06, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 April 2023[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/@SecularTalk Kyle is now at one million subscribers on Youtube Thazair (talk) 10:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now. There is a bot on Wikidata that updates this weekly. It should be updated shortly. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vaush is not connected to Kyle Kulinski in any notable way[edit]

@TheXuitts please stop adding him as an “associated act” of Kyle Kulinski without providing a secondary source for this claim. Mottezen (talk) 18:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this guy notable?[edit]

Does this guy meet notability requirements?

And at one point are editors obligated to correct erroneous information quoted by subjects of a biography? For example this notion that Kulinski is a political moderate in any country but the US because,

"the spectrum of public discourse has shifted to the far-right"

is total nonsense. Jonathan f1 (talk) 01:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this statement as it was violating WP:ABOUTSELF in my opinion. As for notability, I believe the sources present in the article show this person meets WP:GNG. Mottezen (talk) 03:23, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]