Jump to content

Talk:2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Atlanta)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Atlanta) was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 20, 2010Good article nomineeListed
June 15, 2010Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Atlanta)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 20:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am reviewing this article and have made some copy edits, mostly to try to make the article more accessible to those who may not be familiar with the sport. Please feel free to revert any mistakes I have made. Also, I tried to make the language more formal (encyclopedic) and less casual. I tried to wikilink to articles that may explain racing terms. If you can think of any ways of adding information to explain crashes, explosions, deflating tires, hitting the wall etc., please to so. Otherwise the article seems fine and the images, references and structure all check out. Xtzou (Talk) 20:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are talking how they were caused, in which thats what I think your talking about, is not available for publicity. Also some of it will be like an opinion that can be protested. --Nascar1996 23:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, even what the terminology means. Like another person may not know what the "wall" is. I wikilinked the meaning of the different colored flags, which was helpful. Are there other racing terms that can be linked to? Xtzou (Talk) 23:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I found a wikilink for the walls of the race track, or a SAFER Barrier. --Nascar1996 00:07, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is the "NASCAR hauler"?
  • ". Keselowski flew up in the air, flipped over and smacked the wall, roof first, reminiscent of when Keselowski hit Edwards in the 2009 Aaron's 499." Is there a reference for this, or is it an editor's observation (original research)?

Xtzou (Talk) 13:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • But who compares it to Keselowski hit Edwards in the 2009 Aaron's 499? Someone has to do the comparison that you can reference, or it is OR. As far as the "NASCAR hauler", can you describe what its purpose it? Is it to haul the car away?
  • The two wrecks were very similair by just looking at them, but that is not my contribution to the article. As for the NASCAR hauler, each series has there own trailer, like a RV in ways, which are used to discuss situations with some of the drivers, etc. Also, I am removing that sentence. --Nascar1996 19:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xtzou (Talk) 19:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused: }
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Delisted GA

[edit]

As the assessment was done by a socking and essentially banned user, major issues such as prose were not adressed. There should be some element of a progression of the race, but a lap by lap recount is not proper prose. I would suggest a reassessment of this and any other articles the user reviewed once the issues are addressed, see some of the other (more thourough) reviews of other similar articles or ask me for further information.--Terrillja talk 05:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Atlanta). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2010 Kobalt Tools 500 (Atlanta). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2010_Kobalt_Tools_500_(Atlanta)&oldid=1196569068"