Talk:2 Hearts 1 Love

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We appear to have consensus that this title is more common in the sources. Cúchullain ^t/c 18:47, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two Hearts One Love → 2 Hearts 1 Love – Referred to on iTunes, YouTube and their official website as "2 Hearts 1 Love". Relisted. BDD (talk) 23:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Unreal7 (talk) 15:03, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question - you're sure this isn't a cover of Two Hearts One Love (Shania Twain song)? As far as the title, would't it be better to wait for the artwork? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid it seems that there are 3 other notable songs Two Hearts, One Love :( . So what now? In ictu oculi (talk) 17:22, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is the artwork, and no it isn't a cover of the Shania Twain song. Unreal7 (talk) 20:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Okay as far as the move proposal. A comma isn't sufficient to disambiguate from the other 3 Two Hearts, One Love songs, particularly in the era when every song is a "single" on mp3. The STV interview has Two... One... whatever happens in the short term I suspect this article is going to end up at Two Hearts, One Love (911 song) as more sources click in. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When did I say anything about commas? I'm talking about numbers. Unreal7 (talk) 22:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I realise that. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:22, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two Hearts, One Love (911 song) seems good to me, with the numbers and comma adjusted to conform to ordinary Wikipedia house style – at least until we see some dominant quantity of reliable sources indicating otherwise. —BarrelProof (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment only. ~~It would be nice to have enough information in the article to establish whether it is the Twain, or any other song!~~ OK the information is there - just --Richhoncho (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I added what I could find here after asking the question. Reasonable question I thought since they apparently did so many covers before. Anyway. So it is a new song to the 3 others. Without print sources and with artwork not showing the title (odd? temporary artwork for mp3 release only?) bit difficult to say much more. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm fine with using this "official" form if it's reflected in sources as well. Compare to, say, "Nothing Compares 2 U" or "I Would Die 4 U," even though just typing those is probably making me lose some brain cells. Did Prince invent text speak or something? In conclusion, I'm all 4 this move. Erg! --BDD (talk) 18:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I 2 am 4 moving this 1 to its best-cited title. bd2412 T 21:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.