Talk:421-a tax exemption

421-a tax exemption has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 4, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City: Housing Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Housing and Tenant Rights in NY Task Force (assessed as High-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Taxation (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation

Urban studies and planning Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 421-a tax abatement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160630053044/http://gothamist.com/2016/01/14/real_estate_421a.php to http://gothamist.com/2016/01/14/real_estate_421a.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:421-a tax exemption/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) 23:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Review

Should it's new name be in the first sentence perMOS:FIRST? (I see there's already a redirect from that term)
- Maybe. The reason I didn't is because the name is mainly political branding, and seemed out of place in the first sentence. It is also seemed a bit POV to use the political name. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 02:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It seems necessary to mention the affordable housing aspect of the tax break in Concept as it's now an important part of the break.
- I have added a sentence mentioning that in the concept section. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 02:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
a change from temporary subjection to those same laws can this be made clearer?
- I have reworded the sentence. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 02:20, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What were the restriction placed on Manhattan in 1984(?)? The next sentence hints at it but could be made clearer and I'm not sure of the interplay with the next paragraph
- Clarification added, including the other major restriction in 1984, from the same source. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In the GEA section can you clarify under which "old" version you're talking about in the second paragraph?
- Clarified. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did a copy edit as I read. Please make sure I didn't change any meanings.
- I reviewed your copy edit and made any changes necessary to preserve meaning. Overall, the copy edit was well done. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 17:40, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Under the current program is a developer required to maintain affordable rents beyond the first tenant? I'm slightly confused by the various sections.
- I made it specific that new tenants are not covered if the rent of a given unit is over $2700 per month.
See no issues with edit warring, images, OR, or copyright.

Discussion

Can PointsofNoReturn or other editor confirm they are interested in going through the GA review process? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 23:11, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am interested in going through with the review. I will mostly do the heavy work during the weekend due to work, but overall I will be free enough to respond to your review points. Thank you in advance for taking the time to review this article. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 00:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I went on an unexpected wikibreak and forgot to come back to this when I returned late last week. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All good, don't worry about it. I have been on a wikibreak for a while now, so this is no big deal. Thank you for remembering to stop by. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 02:01, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Barkeep49. I have replied to your points about improving the article and made changes in response to your points. Is there anything else you would like to go over? PointsofNoReturn (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PointsofNoReturn: I am traveling at the moment but when I get some time I will review the changes and let you know if there's anything else or I'll close it out as a pass. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 05:09, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Barkeep49 and PointsofNoReturn: Just FYI I added a few clarifying details to the article, nothing significant. I was actually unaware of the GAN until now, but as someone who had to research the 421a exemption today, I think this article is pretty well-written. epicgenius (talk) 00:34, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just looked over the current version, including epicgenius's changes and I agree it's ready to go. Congrats PointsofNoReturn. Sorry for the delays due to my limited Wikipeding while traveling. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:04, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So in looking over the GA list I have put it under Law (the Cases and domestic law subsection) as it seems to fit better there than any of the politics subcategories. If there's a problem with that feel free to move it. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:09, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article, Barkeep49. I really appreciate it. Also, thank you for making the additional changes, Epicgenius. PointsofNoReturn (talk) 03:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Add to article please

Hi all - this article should focus on some more controversies, and add some of these sources:

-- $ɱ$ (talk) 18:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]