Talk:Abbasid dynasty

Arab world Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Muslim history Mid‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim history task force.

Requested move 29 September 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 01:43, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Banu Abbas → Abbasid dynasty – Per WP:ENG and common usage, similar to analogous cases with the Umayyad dynasty (Banu Umayya), Mirdasid dynasty (Banu Mirdas), etc. The family is specifically notable as a caliphal dynasty rather than as a 'mere' Arab clan or tribe. Constantine ✍ 16:40, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support for consistency, but I kind of wonder if we shouldn't be going the other way, e.g., Banu Umayya, etc. Srnec (talk) 13:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support as common name, see also Google ngram. BegbertBiggs (talk) 10:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.