Talk:Malpighia emarginata

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South America: French Guiana Mid‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the French Guiana work group.

Venezuela Low‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Overseas France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Overseas France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Overseas France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Overseas FranceWikipedia:WikiProject Overseas FranceTemplate:WikiProject Overseas FranceOverseas France articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

In 1954, in NYC, we gave our infant son this apple juice "spiked" with acerola. During 1855-58, we had an acerola tree outside our house in Puerto Rico. Our small son often got scratched by the thorns while climbing to pick the "delicious" fruit. The Head of our university Department of Botany told me he had read papers reporting the comparison of the acerola tree with the Japanese cherry tree.jonhays 17:40, 18 Sep 2003 (UTC)

Best name for article

I am leaving the main article here instead of Barbados cherry largely because it was the first one created, and because more pages show up on google for acerola than for Barbados cherry, but the botanical references I have refer to Barbados cherry only. I could be persuaded that it should be moved. Comments? -- WormRunner | Talk 20:00, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Internationally, "acerola" might be the more popular name. It's a reasonably common flavor in Japanese hard candies, and I've only seen it here written out as "acerola" (romaji) and "aserora" (katakana). One way or another, it probably doesn't matter. Colin M. 04:39, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Naming convention says "most common name in English" - Japanese usage shouldn't come into the equation. Guettarda 04:56, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I looked up this article because I tried a box of "orange, guava and acerola berry" juice (which was delicious). Here in NZ i suspect that acerola is the common english name for it. --Aidan 01:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Acerola seems to be the most common usage in (American) English -- I have seen many products boasting acerola, "acerola cherry [sic]," or "acerola berry" as an ingredient, but nothing made with "Barbados cherry"...The Jack 22:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Acerola is basically an exotic marketing name, much like "lingonberry" is for cowberry. That doesn't prevent the original English names from being the correct ones. With some produce, the marketing name eventually takes over and becomes the de-facto name (like oregano for pot marjoram), but should an encyclopedia assist in this transition, or only accept it once it's already complete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.75.65 (talk) 14:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this article to Malpighia glabra because the common names Acerola and Barbados Cherry could also refer to Malpighia emarginata. Both species are cultivated for their fruits; the main difference is range. According the GRIN database, only M. emarginata is native to Barbados, so I propose that Barbados Cherry redirect to that page once it has been written. Another option is to have Barbados Cherry and Acerola redirect to an article that describes the cultivation, properties, and consumption of the fruit of the two species. That is how the article on coffee is written.--TDogg310 (talk) 21:00, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Sectioned like an orange"?

I think not. The fleshy portion of the fruit is deeply lobed, but it is continuous. The inner mesocarp (the "seed") is sectioned, but most people don't get into that portion of the fruit and thus never see the seeds. Calling it "secioned like an orange" is a bit excessive, I think. Guettarda 21:50, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 11:12, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Malpighia emarginata

It turns out that some of the more recent sources (ca. 2008) consider Malpighia glabra a synonym of M. emarginata. The article on M. glabra in the Spanish language Wikipedia made the move in March of 2009. This makes things quite a bit simpler, since acerola previously could have referred to up to 3 species. One problem is that most databases (i.e. GRIN) still consider the two species separate. I'll go ahead and move the article; hopefully its taxonomy won't change much in the future.--TDogg310 (talk) 04:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The only problem is that these are two distinct, but separate species. The true M. glabra is smaller, with smaller fruit and is more cold hardy (and is native to S. Texas and Mexico) while Malpighia punicifolia (previously, and incorrectly called M. glabra) is a large, cold tender, tree with larger fruit.[1]

Vitamin C

The article currently claims

The vitamin C produced by the fruit is better absorbed by humans than synthetic ascorbic acid.

The reference cited itself cites

Araújo P.S.R., Minami K., Acerola, Fundação Cargill, Campinas, SP, Brazil, 1994, 81 p.

And that reference doesn't seem to be online.

Anyway, I ask anyone who has access to tell me who they cite (it doesn't seem to be an original work on ascorbic acid absorption), or maybe how this was measured. I suspsect that it just means that the enantiomerically-pure ascorbic acid from living organisms is better absorbed than racemic ascorbic acid (mixture of equal parts of the 2 enantiomers). And that's not something notable for an article on a particular plant (see vitamin C, enantiomer, homochirality).

Icek (talk) 12:20, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the claim was added by User:Alenhardt about 3 years ago, and it seems to be Alenhardt's only Wikipedia edit, so we are unlikely to get a reply from him. Icek (talk) 12:31, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any Unique or Rare benefits compared to other berries/fruits?

Higher than average Vitamin-C content is the only benefit mentioned on most reliable web pages found by Google. Which is irrelevant for a smart consumer, as one can buy Vitamin C in bulk instead of buying Acerola Powder. ee1518 (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

growing conditions

I have this tree well etablished in a non-profected area in my yard in Kissimmee, Florida, slightly south but much further inland than Cape Canaveral. This article may need to be adjusted based on updated growing zones due to climate change. Valerie (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking of properly sourced text

Please be on the lookout for blanking of properly sourced text (sourced from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, a reputable source which the blanking editor mistakenly called "dubious") in this article:

Instance 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Malpighia_emarginata&diff=1206234788&oldid=1206233918

76.190.213.189 (talk) 16:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How's it properly sourced? Bon courage (talk) 16:02, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) is part of the United States National Library of Medicine (NLM), a branch of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). It is approved and funded by the government of the United States. The NCBI is located in Bethesda, Maryland, and was founded in 1988 through legislation sponsored by US Congressman Claude Pepper.

The NCBI houses a series of databases relevant to biotechnology and biomedicine and is an important resource for bioinformatics tools and services. Major databases include GenBank for DNA sequences and PubMed, a bibliographic database for biomedical literature. Other databases include the NCBI Epigenomics database. All these databases are available online through the Entrez search engine. NCBI was directed by David Lipman, one of the original authors of the BLAST sequence alignment program and a widely respected figure in bioinformatics.

76.190.213.189 (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what? The cited source was a primary study from a dodgy publisher (MDPI) which did not appear to support the cited text. Or did I miss something? Bon courage (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's a food

What does it taste like? Drsruli (talk) 06:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]