Talk:Alfred Gilbert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAlfred Gilbert has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 15, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 7, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that sculptor Alfred Gilbert fled England twice—once for love, once for money?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alfred Gilbert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

daughter Caprina Fahey[edit]

One of his daughters was a notable suffragette, as I am drafting article it is currently a redlink. Any information is being sought for her article and also for the Norfolk Museums (see reference within article). Kaybeesquared (talk) 20:27, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

now at Caprina Fahey Mujinga (talk) 10:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miscitation from the ODNB regarding the Shaftesbury Memorial Fountain[edit]

The 'Career: Creative period' section of this article includes this sentence: "It was only because he had been experimenting with different techniques that he was able to cast aluminium, a then new material which he used to create the statue of Anteros which topped the sculpture."

The citation given in support of this statement is the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. However, the ODNB article on Gilbert says: "When in the later 1880s it became possible to cast aluminium cheaply, he was the first artist to employ this new alloy to create the soaring figure of Eros—the light, silvery, buoyant nude symbolic of selfless love which crowns his next important sculptural commission, the Shaftesbury memorial in Piccadilly Circus, London, unveiled in 1893."[1] That article makes no mention of Anteros (though it does say that "the nude figure of Eros was mistaken for Cupid" in the early years of the statue's existence).

The ODNB article may be wrong to insist that the figure is Eros, but isn't it nevertheless inappropriate to miscite it in the way that's been done here? If there's a scholarly work that makes it clear the statue represents Anteros rather than Eros, I believe it would be preferable to cite it instead of the ODNB. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any such work, as all the academic publications I've consulted say the figure is Eros, though a couple acknowledge that Gilbert once said the figure was Anteros, among several conflicting statements he made on the subject some years after the sculpture's installation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russ London (talkcontribs) 15:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. The next sentence in the text does give a reference for the statue being Anteros. Our article Shaftesbury Memorial Fountain seems to think it is Anteros as well. We could make a note on the confusion, but it's perhaps easier just to change "a then new material which he used to create the statue of Anteros which topped the sculpture" to "a then new material which he used to create the statue which topped the sculpture". I'll do that now. Mujinga (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for your attentive response.
Russ London (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References