This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
I'm about to remove a big chunk of this article per WP:BLP and WP:ONUS. I refer interested parties to the discussion at Talk:Jedwabne pogrom#Education Minister Anna Zalewska. I would also point out that some of what I'm deleting is patent nonsense. What does "Her sacrosanct was aimed at the most recent investigation that was aimed at proving the revelation, according to Mr. Jan T. Gross, true." even mean in English? — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk02:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Some of what you removed was indeed nonsense, but you also removed material which was sourced to a mainstream newspaper. When public officials do something that generates worldwide criticism, we should not censor that information. Impact Hub (talk) 19:09, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter if she is a historian or not- she is a public official , in a position of influence (education minister!). We are not using her statements as a source of historical fact in an article about the pogrom - we are discussing the public outcry over her words, as documented by sources. The sources provided say she appeared to deny or minimize the participation of Poles . Impact Hub (talk) 19:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it was sourced to a mainstream newspaper. I didn't realize that. By all means then, violate Wikipedia policy, because it was published in a mainstream newspaper. Just like the horoscope.
Violate policy? not at all. the difference is, I actually read the policy. Here's what WP:BLP says regarding public figures: In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is noteworthy, relevant, and well documented, it belongs in the article – even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. If you cannot find multiple reliable third-party sources documenting the allegation or incident, leave it out.
There are multiple reliable 3rd party sources documenting this (and I will shortly add several more). If you have actual policy-based arguments, you are welcome to present them , after you familiarize yourself with what the policy actually is. Impact Hub (talk) 23:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Chill out, User:Impact Hub (with 12 edits under your belt since yesterday), and don't teach your father, how to make babies. You say, you "actually read the policy", good for you! Because WP:BLP also says in the opening section that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid.Poeticbenttalk23:20, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Chill out yourself. None of my sources are tabloids, and neither you nor Shabazz are my "father". I recognize that you are offended that your Minister of Education has caught a firestorm over her comments, but that's life - when you're in the public eye and you say shit like that, you get skewered. And this encyclopedia reflects that, like it does for countless other politicians who say shit like that.Impact Hub (talk)
