Talk:Attack Attack! (album)

Edit request from 76.92.115.55, 26 May 2010

Three studio quality tracks from their upcoming album have been released on their MySpace page: "Sexual Man Chocolate", "Renob, Nevada", and "Smokahontas", along with the lyrics in a MySpace blog.

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Also,

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.--mono 00:29, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Track listing

Sexual Man Chocolate - 3:18
Renob, Nevada - 3:14
"I Swear I'll Change"
Shut Your Mouth (feat. McSwagger)
A for Andrew
Smokahontas - 3:54
AC-130
Fumbles O'Brian
Turbo Swag
Lonely (feat. Jason Cameron)

76.92.115.55 (talk) 00:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dubcore, really?

I don't think this genre exists or even describes this band's music. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.135.30 (talk) 03:48, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, according to this article, dubcore has been described as a dance kind of music, which would describe some of their music. Guitarist Andrew Whiting has said that the track "Shut Your Mouth" will be "electro that the states haven't heard before". So, in that case, it would be correct. Also, I have moved this post down to the bottom of the page to fulfill correct Wiki formatting. qö₮$@37 (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

urbo Swag

Can someone find a reliable source about "Turbo Swag" being spelled as "urbo Swag"? That's how it is on the back cover for the album. Mes tex (talk) 02:21, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What? if you're asking for a reliable source because you can't tell that its misspelled on the back, try http://www.formspring.me/WetzelAA/q/577506257 Wetzel refers to it as "Turbo swag". - Jer757 03:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Renob Spelled Backwards

I recently removed this little bit from the article:

"And fans have made a big deal that the song "Renob, Nevada" is a reference to Reno, Nevada and "Renob" is the word "Boner" spelt backwards."

I'm sorry, but is this really necessary? Also, what fans are complaining? Is there an actual source that shows that there is controversy over them adding a 'b' to the end of Reno to make it "boner" spelled backwards? I intended to change the grammar used in this sentence, but the entirety of the statement dumbfounded me to the point where I just couldn't look at it anymore. If we can get a source for this statement, sure, add it back in, but it's an unnecessary statement with nothing to back it up, riddled with grammar inconsistencies. --NintendoTim (talk) 02:21, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put that because I did a Youtube study were 48 out of 50 days I look at the video for the song the top comment was about renob being Boner backwards and 46 out of 48 times it was about Reno,Nevada.Brett2829 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brett2829 (talk • contribs) 04:21, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested moves

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus, same move for the band articles closed as such. —innotata 02:00, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– WP:Naming conventions (music), WP:DIFFPUNCT, and WP:PRECISION. See also related RM on the two bands at Talk:Attack_Attack!#Requested_moves. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per the band names. bd2412 T 01:52, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom ; these titles should redirect to the disambiguation page Attack Attack -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:18, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and issues discussed in other closely-related RM. —BarrelProof (talk) 05:06, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until the titles of the bands' articles are decided in that discussion. If the bands' articles are not moved, or are disambiguated in other ways, there will probably be a request to move these articles again for consistency. Peter James (talk) 12:10, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't a reason for opposing. The RMs are linked, they ideally should have been all together, but these need considering at the same time. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They could be considered together in one discussion, it's just that by discussing them separately without precedent to take from one to the other or an option of supporting consistency, there is the possibility that another request will be needed. Peter James (talk) 23:28, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Too clunky to be useful, not to mention the extra "!" in the second band's name. Use hat notes to distinguish them.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:11, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
About "Oppose until the titles of the bands' articles are decided in that discussion.": at 14:48, 10 September 2014 (UTC) discussion at Talk:Attack Attack!/Archives/2014 1#Requested moves was closed (not by me) without moving, as undecided. That discussion was about:-
- Attack Attack! → Attack Attack! (American band)
- Attack! Attack! → Attack! Attack! (Welsh band)
  - Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose there was similar discussion with the band names, which was closed as unsuccessful.--Retrohead (talk) 10:23, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Hard to see that second "!". Snappy (talk) 20:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, The band names have not been moved on the basis of no consensus. These pages should not be moved on the basis of WP:CRITERIA and consistency. Gregkaye ✍♪ 11:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.