Jump to content

Talk:BpNichol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Raccoons and Fraggle Rock

[edit]

bpNichol also was one of the staff writers on the Raccoons, a Canadian cartoon that ran from 1985-1991. However, it is suspected that the final set of episodes was completed in 1989, but held for a few years for unknown reasons. Either way, he worked on it towards the end of his life. If needed, I can supply more information on this.

What about his work on Fraggle Rock?134.224.220.1 (talk) 21:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barrie Phillip Nichol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Barrie Phillip Nichol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 January 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. The discussion has corroborated the nominator's statement that "bpNichol" is the subject's WP:COMMONNAME. The question of whether to adopt the stylized name "bpNichol" (as opposed to the more standard "B. P. Nichol") was more disputed. Ultimately, the strength of PAG-backed argument favored the adoption of the stylized title: PAGs leveled in the discussion, such as MOS:PERSONAL, MOS:LCITEMS, and MOS:SPACEINITS, were clear that stylized personal names are appropriate article titles when they are widely used by RS. As alluded to above, the common usage of the stylized title was widely accepted by discussion participants. Though MOS:TM and WP:TITLETM were raised as favoring "B. P. Nichol", those PAGs focus on naming conventions for trademarked products rather than for people; additionally, WP:TITLETM provides an explicit carve-out for nonstandard titles that are demonstrably the most common among independent sources. Therefore, the strongest argument is for adopting the originally proposed title of "bpNichol". (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 21:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barrie Phillip Nichol → BpNichol – This page was arbitrarily moved, without discussion, to its current title in 2014 with the edit summary that "regardless of WortArt pen names, Wikipedia uses actual names". However, that is not the rule on Wikipedia — our naming convention for people is to use the name by which the person is most commonly known, not necessarily the full name on their birth certificate. In the case of this poet, the most common name is very unequivocally bpNichol, and I don't think one person in a thousand ever really knew that his given names were "Barrie Phillip". For the most clearly similar situations to this I can think of, the "Constant Craving" chanteuse is located at k.d. lang, not "Kathryn Dawn Lang", and the "anyone lived in a pretty how town" poet is at E. E. Cummings, not "Edward Estlin Cummings". Bearcat (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose that type of stylization in the title. Something like "B. P. Nichol" might be an acceptable article title. Rreagan007 (talk) 02:25, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per WP:COMMONNAME, the examples given by nominator, and examples such as bell hooks and will.i.am. I'm seeing 182 hits in newpapers.com for "bpNichol" (almost all with that casing); 11 hits for "Barrie Phillip Nichol", and 33 hits for "Barrie Nichol". The latter two also include some of the former since the pattern of mentioning his given name is common, of course (and odder examples like poet bp (Barrie) Nichol). Search books on archive.org finds similar ratios. Google books is harder since Google apparently "knows" that "Barrie Phillip Nichol" and bpNichol are the same person. Skynxnex (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    So my basis (with more numeric support below in this comment and my reply to ⁠BarrelProof show that in recent times, bpNichol is the common name) for this is from WP:PSEUDONYM which says The name used most often to refer to a person in reliable sources is generally the one that should be used as the article title, even if it is not the person's "real" name and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)#Standard_format_and_variations says Names that are not capitalized include k.d. lang and danah boyd. and MOS:PERSONAL says names are almost always first-letter capitalized. An exception is made when the lowercase variant has received regular and established use in reliable independent sources. and MOS:LCITEMS says some individuals do not want their personal names capitalized. In such cases, Wikipedia articles may use lower-case variants of personal names if they have regular and established use in reliable third-party sources (for example, k.d. lang). From this, I think that bpNichol meets the standards for being lower case and as per MOS:SPACEINITS meets the requirements for dropping the periods and spaces An initial is capitalized and is followed by a full point (period) and a space (e.g. J. R. R. Tolkien), unless: * the person demonstrably has a different, consistently preferred style for their own name; and * an overwhelming majority of reliable sources use that variant style for that person. In such a case, treat it as a self-published name change. Examples include k.d. lang, CC Sabathia, and CCH Pounder. Given all that, I think bpNichol is the form that matches both Wikipedia policy/guidelines, the person's preference, and common usage as opposed to "b.p.nichol"/"b.p. nichol"/"b. p. nichol".
    Looking through book results, bpNichol seems to be the name people know him as, often mentioning his birth name, sometimes treating "bp" as a first name and "Nichol" as a second: On April 7, 1964, ..., he wrote a poem in his journal that he signed simple "bp," the name by which he is known to literary history and the reason some called him beep. ¶ Nichol had experienced ..., But, still, bpNichol is he most common full name among variations I've seen.
    Google ngrams for bpNichol,B. P. Nichol, Barrie Phillip Nichol (adding things like "B.P.Nichol" doesn't adjust the results): but doing an ngram search from 1959 to 2019 English shows a very large margin (like at least 50 times more for bpNichols compared to either other variant) since 1995 and a large margin starting around 1968; before then when there are results the three are pretty equal from 1960 through 1967). This is also supported by casually browsing modern-day art and poetry sites that prefer bpNichol while mentioning the other forms as his birth name.) (Pinging (and apologies for the length) @BarrelProof, @Bearcat, @Cinderella157, and @Rreagan007 given I think i've added sufficient info to look at it again.) Skynxnex (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to B. P. Nichol per Rreagan007 or possible BpNichol per nom (leaning toward the former). IMDb seems to use B.P. Nichol, and I see 316 matches in a similar newspapers.com search. That seems more in line with MOS:TM / WP:TITLETM. The newspaper search does not seem to distinguish between "B. P. Nichol" and "B.P. Nichol", although MOS:SPACEINITS suggests the former. I agree with the nom that the current title doesn't seem best. I lean more toward B. P. Nichol, but quite a few of the cited sources do seem to use BpNichol. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I think IMDb uses B. P. Nichol because that was how he was credited on Fraggle Rock originally, which I don't think should be a big factor in weighing the final name. The full credits note that he was often credited as "bpNichol" and "b.p. Nichol" as well. The newspaper.com results for "B. P. Nichol" also show a moderate number of them are "b.p. Nichol" and a few "b p Nichol" (no periods). It appears in newspapers "bpNichol" and "B. P. Nichol" have similar counts (with a slight lead for bpNichol) and it appears he almost universally published as bpNichol and went by that name professionally. Further if you limit the newspapers.com search to be 2000 and later, the counts change to 77 hits for "bpNichol" and 8 hits (after excluding 3 false matches) for "B. P. Nichol" and about four of those are "b. p. Nichol". So I think the common name is bpNichol enough to justify a move. Skynxnex (talk) 20:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Move to B. P. Nichol per evidence by BarrelProof Cinderella157 (talk) 10:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Discography

[edit]

A discography should be included 67.70.57.47 (talk) 05:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:BpNichol&oldid=1248642644"