Talk:China–Vietnam relations

Vietnam Mid‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from China–Vietnam relations appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2008, and was viewed approximately 476 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that although allies during the Vietnam War, bilateral relations between China and Vietnam deteriorated due to disputes over the Gulf of Tonkin and Cambodia, resulting in the Sino-Vietnamese War of 1979?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/June.

Wikipedia

Pre-1950s relations

I'm not the person to do so, but I expect the article needs to cover relations going back to the colonial and pre-colonial periods. Otherwise, an excellent start. 61.69.2.101 (talk) 14:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong information

After the battle of Bach Dang (938), Vietnam is totally independent from China. Since then, Vietnam is not a China's vassal state. So, why does this article says: "it successfully asserted a degree of independence following the Battle of Bạch Đằng River in 938 AD"?

And in 1474 invasion, Vietnam was officially named Dai Viet (literally: Great Viet), why does this articles says Vietnam's name at that time was Annam?

In 1960 the president of China wasn't Deng Xiaoping. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.0.173.41 (talk) 15:37, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

French documents from the colonial period of vietnam

http://books.google.com/books?id=PusSAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=5kM8AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA84#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=cTkwAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA33#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=ubAoAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA33#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=KqFAAQAAIAAJ&pg=RA2-PA33#v=onepage&q&f=false

Rajmaan (talk) 04:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on China–Vietnam relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110128160254/http://www.vnemba.org.cn/vi to http://www.vnemba.org.cn/vi/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section needs attention

The lead section is written in rather poor language. Sentences such as "China perceived Vietnam's domination over Indochina from Vietnam's historical legacy" do not even make sense. -The Gnome (talk) 21:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]