Jump to content

Talk:Cluny Abbey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

"This act of foundation also tarted the Order of Cluny. " This statement is in error. --Wetman 02:27, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You should remove anything you know to be false. I just translated the thing without fact checking. BrianSmithson 02:57, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I was too rash. Not false. More misleading: if someone tried to build an article Order of Cluny that was separate from Abbey of Cluny, they'd soon be in a tangle. All Cluniac houses were priories dependent on the abbey. The rule was a revision of Benedict's rule, but the "Cluniac order" is a phrase too easily cast about that leads to non-historical expectations. --Wetman 03:25, 10 August 2005 (UTC).[reply]
  • Cluniac nunneries: Can someone provide some details, with a less anachronistic assessment than the present text: "Partly due to the order's opulence the Cluniac nunneries were not seen as being particularly cost-effective which may also reflected in the order's apparent lack of interest in founding many new houses for women." I know nothing of the Cluniac nunneries. Governed by prioresses? --Wetman 22:21, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

--- Is there a list of abbots anywhere that we could use? Adam Bishop 00:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

organization

[edit]

The last paragraph of the section on 'organization' begins with a run-on sentence and makes little sense. I paste it here:

The customs of Cluny also represented a shift from the earlier ideal of a Benedictine monastery as an agriculturally self-sufficient unit similar to the contemporary villa that survived in the more Romanized parts of Europe and the manor of more feudal parts, in which each member did physical labor as well as offering prayer.

Please, someone with resources or knowledge about Cluny, clarify this. Whoistheroach 21:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though it may tire the lip muscles, the above sentence is not a run-on senence, this is a run-on sentence. --Wetman 03:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible merger

[edit]

There are two distinct articles. The second and shorter one, which was apparently recently vandalized, is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cluniac_reforms. It should be considered and merged into the larger article.

DeVeritate 05:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of merging, the article on the Cluniac reforms could be expanded. What was there to be reformed? Richard Erdoes, in his book A.D. 1000, has several pages of sometimes shocking monastic behavior. I would like to see the state of monasticism and the process of reform more thoroughly discussed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.61.220.157 (talk) 22:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed

[edit]

Section Cluniac Houses in Britain[1]:

  • "The head of their order was the Abbot at Cluny. All English Cluniacs were bound to cross to France to Cluny to consult or be consulted unless the Abbot chose to come to England. The abbot came to England five times in the 13th century, and only twice in the 14th."

Is it the same abbot who came five times in the 13th & only twice in the 14th?

--Frania W. (talk) 15:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name changes

[edit]

Please discuss before moving the article again.Eustachiusz (talk) 00:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Many hidden facts on Bysantine Arts and Donnations through Serbian Princess Theophano

[edit]

If Cluney Abbey was " built in succession from the 4th to the early 12th centuries" how is that possible that it was "founded by W....in 910" ? Why there is no word on the richest woman Theophano (Otto II spouse from Serbia) who donnated Serbian artists for churches' decoration all over the Europe and especially in Cluny? Why there is no mention on the church schiisme in 1054? Have Vatican's "writers" tried to hide what was Cluney for ? A money center of ancient UNDIVIDIDED Christian world - before 1054 schiisme! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.227.244.217 (talk) 12:56, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Henry III

[edit]

The section 'Cluny's Influence' suggests a significant Cluniac influence on Holy Roman Emperor Henry III, but there are no references to Cluny or Cluniacs in the article on Henry III.Clivemacd (talk) 18:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lay Influence

[edit]

The section 'Cluny's Influence' contains the contradictory statements 'Free of lay and episcopal interference....' (first para) and 'Cluniac priors worked eagerly with local royal and aristocratic patrons of their houses' (fourth para).Clivemacd (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cluny Abbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cluny Abbey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested citation

[edit]

In introduction: "The establishment of the Benedictine Order was a keystone to the stability of European society that was achieved in the 11th century.[citation needed]" Cluny Abbey as key to stability is a theme in Tom Holland's Forge of Christendom (2008).Tmciver (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redwall Reference?

[edit]

Is there really no reference to Brian Jacques' Redwall? Given that the book's location is at an abbey and the main antagonist's name is Cluny the Scourge, I would expect some sort of reference.

Cluny III church

[edit]

This church was very influential in Middle Ages, and it was throughout researched and impressively reconstructed by Conant. It is worth a detailed description. Ulamm (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]