Jump to content

Talk:Custom Robo Arena

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Greybaum and Hadron

[edit]

I think you should include info on Greybaum!

  1. please sign your comments.
  2. what significance to this article does that have? Would it improve it in any way?

KMB5, Kevin 20 5 23 26 21:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Boxart"

[edit]

It's an obvious fake. Don't re-add it again.

Good job, but you should mention that in the edit summary to let other editors know. Also, it seems the picture was a mock cover taken from Nintendo's forums [1]--TBC 14:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title change

[edit]

First of all, there is no relevant source as to where the Japanese title has been announced. Im not gonna revert it but at least edit the soruce in the article.166.102.136.111 17:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Post-release Update

[edit]

Updated information about the game itself, including the diorama mode and changed some slightly misleading descriptions. Also added links to the official japanese site, and to some videos also on the Nintendo site. --Kryss hon 11:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

list of ranks: Beginner; Pawn; Knight; Bishop; Baronette; Baron; Viscount; Earl; Marquis; Prince; Duke; G.Duke (Gold Duke); Queen; King; Robomaster. Your experience points can only go up to 9999, which bestows you the title "Robomaster" --Kryss hon 15:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Release changes

[edit]

We need to make some major changes to this page-like the character nake saki-her name in the english version is Liv... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 168.170.197.10 (talk) 13:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Robo Types

[edit]

I would like to say that the comment about "Little Sprinters" being fast is completely unnecessary. For one thing, this is obvious, because sprinting means pretty much the same thing as running. For another, there are many more robo types that do not get explanations, even though their meanings are less obvious. I will remove this comment if nobody can think of a reason it needs to stay. --The F50 Man 21:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been vandalised many times before, so it probably is this time as well. It is best to remove it.

The Stealth Knight,Kevin 20 5 23 26 21:34, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the list of robo types should be in its own section not the battle section.

[edit]

Also I think the battle section should be more detailed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ADDER2 (talkcontribs) 20:41, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia articles try to decribe a subject in detail for any observer. What it is not trying to be is a manual for the game or a strategy guide. If you got into great detail in the battle section, it would quickly become a strategy guide of sorts. Sincerely,Kevin 20 5 23 26 20:20, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

In the list of different kinds of robos, it says for #13 "Lightning Skiers". I assume this is vandalism, as the real name is Lightning Sky. I will delete it immediately. Sincerely,Kevin 20 5 23 26 20:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"lightning Skiers" is the class on the Japanese version. Kryss hon 15:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please, whoever is vandalising this article please stop! I noticed about five other occasions where there were seemingly deliberate spelling errors, including "Hadaron" and a misspelling of Encephalon Isle. I also noticed a place where before there had been a comma, but was replaced with a period. So whoever it is, please stop. Signed by the Lightning Knight, Kevin 20 5 23 26 21:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Kryss, I didn't know that. But the spelling errors I am almost positive are vandalism. Sincerely, Kevin 20 5 23 26 18:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection

[edit]

I personally think that this article should be semi-protected, because I can see so many places that have vandalism. I think someone should take action. Sincerely,Kevin 20 5 23 26 21:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do you semi-edit an article, anyways? Kevin 20 5 23 26 23:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friend Code Problems

[edit]

I try to enter other people's friend codes and I always get an error, what am i doing wrong?

This also happens on Final Fantasy III DS.

I really need help, urgently! JoshuaMD 27th May 2007 11:39 (GMT)

Although I sympathise iwth your problem, this isn't a forum. Your only supposed to use this page for article-related questions and comments. --The F50 Man 21:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Trivia section

[edit]

I'm going to delete the trivia section as parts are inaccurate and it is short, and it also should be incorporated into the article. I know that practically no one cares about this article or talk page anymore (or seems to, anyway, as my several comments here have been unanswered for a long time). If you want to revert it, go ahead, but please tell me why on this talk page. Kevin 20 5 23 26 19:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More deletion and some questions

[edit]

I know this article keeps getting smaller and smaller, but the information I deleted was unnecessary. Namely, it was about "different robos having different charge attacks", which if you have that info, you might as well have all the controls, and this article is not supposed to be a manual. Also, I think there is too much info on the stroyline, as it should be a storyline summary. I will delete what I feel is unnecessary. Kevin 20 5 23 26

Article Clean-N-Update Tips

[edit]

Here are four tips on how to clean and update this article:

  • For its "Plot", rearrange it and add some info about the game's setting and characters.
  • For its "Gameplay", include a screenshot of the first custom robo battle shown in the game. Also, explain the difference between Custom Robo Arena and the previous Custom Robo titles.
  • Find and include information about the game's development.
  • Find and connect the same article in other languages to the English one (optional).
  • Add references.

AND

  • Add this article to several lists.

Hope all this helps anyone supporting this article. Parrothead1983 23:57, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RoboGamecover.jpg

[edit]

Image:RoboGamecover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Storyline editing

[edit]

The storyline section is a mess. It's far too long, and much of It's info is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.61.11.54 (talk) 18:54, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rays

[edit]

hey why is the ray models the only ones with like Ray mk 2 and mk 3 and ray 01 and ray sky but theres only one mirand,one caret, and one Apollo what the heck?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.60.224.15 (talk) 02:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC) uhhh theres a ilegal ray in the specails<---mistake my spelling — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesonic20021 (talkcontribs) 18:44, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Details

[edit]

Character descriptions are over-detailed. --Limxzero (talk) 18:11, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Custom Robo Arena. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up the Story section!

[edit]

The "Story" section is way, way too long (as you have probably already seen). It seems to be describing the Pokémon-like story with every single battle described. Nobody comes here to read that.

I'm putting this here to ask other Wikipedians what we should do about the story section. Should it get deleted? Probably yes, but then what would replace it?

(I'd put a summary of the story in place of the Current story section, except I don't own the game, and most of the described story is about the battles.) ObsessiveScribe (talk) 19:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]