|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Diablo III article.|
|Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5|
|edit||Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)|
|This is not a forum for general discussion about Diablo III. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Diablo III at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk.|
|WikiProject Video games||(Rated B-class, Mid-importance)|
The second paragraph says that the player can choose from six classes, but that is not correct. The sixth class, Crusader, is only available with the "Reaper of Souls" expansion pack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.8.131.52 (talk) 22:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
The tone of the article misleads
You would draw from the article that the game was an overall commercial success and an overall critical success.
The first, yes; thanks to the carry over from the love of the second and first versions.
The second, no, no no.
Diablo III was acknowledged to have fundamental flaws by the developers, prompting the major reworks of "Loot 2.0" etc.
An article written by a savvy player would be better than wikipedias's corporate drivel.
- That's nice, but the critical reception is pretty high too. Yes, the game was an overall success. No, that doesn't mean it was problem free. -- ferret (talk) 15:08, 4 July 2014 (UTC)