Talk:The Curse of Fatal Death

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Older[edit]

Should this really be in the category of Doctor Who serials, considering it was a one-off and not part of the official televised serial list? Ditto with Dimensions in Time. --khaosworks 04:20, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)

They are both Doctor Who and they are both serials, and that's good enough for me. (Granted, neither is part of the original series, but where else can we put them?) --Paul A 07:16, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
In the same general Doctor Who category, basically. -khaosworks 07:20, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Terserus[edit]

Isn't there more than one mention of the planet Terserus in the series? That should have a note, I think (but I don't remember where Terserus was mentioned, help!)...

Added note. --khaosworks 14:44, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
I think Terserus is also mentioned in the EDA "Legacy of the Daleks". It was Susan who stranded the Master there. But, if the Curse of Fatal Death is canon (heh), maybe he fell into a sewer on Terserus... and that's why he looks so icky in the Deadly Assassin (just kidding) --Travlr23 11:43, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Terserus was also mention in the last frame of the comic strip 'A Matter of Life and Death' in DWM 250.

Three Ninth Doctors[edit]

I reworded the note about the "three Ninth Doctors" mentioned in The Gallifrey Chronicles, because I was concerned that speculation about connecting the three Ninth Doctors with the three versions of the Eighth Doctor (audios, novels and comics) was a bit too speculative. If there's a real indication of that in the novel that I've forgotten, please feel free to restore the notion — but if it's just a bit of fan speculation, we shouldn't have it here (unless it's been published in a reliable source like Doctor Who Magazine or something — in which case we should have a citation). —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 08:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well the thing about the novel is that it doesn't in any way identify the Doctors. It's literally just one line where Marnal flatly asserts that there are three ninth Doctors. I think it needs a proviso saying that no positive identification is given for any of the mentioned Doctors. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 15:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Proviso added, but a nice quote by the author in which he explains the line, if such a quote exists, would be preferable, however. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 16:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Music[edit]

Does anyone notice a similar resemblance to the music from Logopolis in this story? Xdt (talk · contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:DoctorWho-TheCurseofFatalDeath.jpg[edit]

Image:DoctorWho-TheCurseofFatalDeath.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard E Grant[edit]

At Richard E Grant, he's called the "The Conceited Doctor". Here, it's the "Quite Handsome Doctor". So, which is it??--Jeffro77 (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidence, trivia, or what?[edit]

The article currently includes these li'l snippets:

I can just about see the relevance of the first one, if it can be referenced. It's still sort of a "coincidence of charity", unless it can be proved that the actors agreed to the performance as a way of trying to angle for a part in a future revival or of finally playing the part in the only way available to them at the time. Eh, it still may relevant enough as a "spooky coincidence". But the second one—I dunno. If it was a deliberate thing done by Moffat, where he was literally quoting Hartnell, it's significant. Otherwise, it's just coincidence, isn't it? CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 15:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Avaliable via the Internet"[edit]

I removed the following from the "Broadcast and Releases" section:

  • The Curse of Fatal Death was also available worldwide via the Internet in four episodes.

Although some Internet users video-captured the special and placed it up for unauthorized download in the small video formats feasible at the time, it was not officially webcast in any way. The fact isn't worth noting here. Rob T Firefly (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was available at the Comic Relief website - which is how I first saw it... Etron81 (talk) 16:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Followed by?[edit]

An anonymous editor added "Rose" in the "followed by" field in the infobox. I reverted it, but I suppose it's worth discussing. Is the "followed by" field for "next Doctor Who story aired on television", or is it for "next television story in the ongoing narrative of Doctor Who"? Because if it's the former, I suppose we should put Doctor Who (1996 film) in the "preceded by" film, and put this (as well as "Rose") in the "followed by" field for the TV movie, the way we do for the Children in Need specials, or the way that Survival does for Dimensions in Time. Is it too "fannish" to consider the fact that when the TV series returned, it followed on from the TV movie, and not this spoof (despite Moffat's involvement)? Is continuity too unencyclopedic a criterion? Discuss. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:20, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Rose" got added at some point without any further discussion. Does anyone have any thoughts about this? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis needs an edit[edit]

The synopsis is more than that, it's the whole plot with lots of detail. Perhaps someone could do a proper synopsis without retelling the whole story?

This should be done in respect of the authors (go see the thing) and the readers (point them to the story, don't present it here.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigwbrown (talk • contribs) 10:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

We have the precedent of Doctor Who and the Silurians, but I'm wondering if The Curse of Fatal Death would fit better per WP:COMMONNAME? This is not a requested move. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Old Naval Rooftops (talk • contribs) 21:08, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doctor Who: The Curse of Fatal Death. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Doctor Who: The Curse of Fatal Death[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Doctor Who: The Curse of Fatal Death's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ThirteenthDoctorCasting":

  • From Doctor Who: "Doctor Who: Jodie Whittaker is to replace Peter Capaldi in the Time Lord regeneration game". The Telegraph. 16 July 2017. Retrieved 16 July 2017.
  • From Jodie Whittaker: "Doctor Who: Jodie Whittaker is to replace Peter Capaldi in the Time Lord regeneration game". The Daily Telegraph. 16 July 2017. Retrieved 16 July 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:34, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Never Cruel Or Cowardly"[edit]

The phrase "Never Cruel Or Cowardly" is very likely to have appeared in a Paul Cornell novel (no reference is given but it's plausible) but I believe the original is from Terrance Dicks either in an internal style guide for writers or in the book "The Making of Doctor Who" in the early-mid 1970s. I do not have an authoritative reference to hand, however. Rob Burbidge (talk) 23:48, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. the following is from the Target edition of The Making of Doctor Who, page 23 (emphasis is mine):

"The Doctor believes in good and fights evil. Though often caught up in violent situations, he is a man of peace. He is never cruel or cowardly. In fact, to put it simply, the Doctor is a hero. These days there aren't so many of them around ..."

The earlier Piccolo edition does not include this phrase, but does have the following on page 8:

"Put in simpler terms, the Doctor always cares about people; he believes in good and fights evil. He is never cruel, and he never carries a gun or other weapon. He is often in battles, but he hates war."

Etron81 (talk) 23:58, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 March 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as proposed. BD2412 T 16:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who: The Curse of Fatal Death → The Curse of Fatal Death – Per the article, the episode was known as "Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death" around its original broadcast. As far as I can tell, no on-screen title was used during the Comic Relief 1999 evening. The VHS release then used the standardised format of displaying the series logo and "The Curse of Fatal Death" underneath, as shown in the cover image in the article, and according to the article the home release uses the simplified title on-screen also. There doesn't seem to be any reason why the series title is included in this iteration of the title for the article. "Doctor Who and the Curse of Fatal Death" may be an acceptable alternative, but I suggest the simplified version due to the lack of an on-screen broadcast title and the official home release that uses it, in conjunction with WP:CONCISE. Move requires overwriting of the present redirect. U-Mos (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The onscreen title at original broadcast in four parts did have the "and the" format - screenshot is included here - I do agree that the common name is now just "The Curse of Fatal Death" due to the home video release and subsequent coverage (including official uploads to YouTube) Etron81 (talk) 14:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I hadn't managed to establish that. I'm still in favour of the simplified title. U-Mos (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Curse_of_Fatal_Death&oldid=1215176725"