Talk:ECW One Night Stand (2006)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ECW One Night Stand (2006) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

ECW One Night Stand (2006) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 11, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Professional wrestling Mid‑importance

	ECW One Night Stand (2006) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Good article nomination speedily failed

The good article nomination of this article has been speedily failed because of a complete lack of reliable sources (see WP:QFC 2.1). This is because all sources in this article link to the website or press releases of WWE, the producers of this event. Because these sources are not independent of the producers of the subject of the article, they are not reliable (see WP:RS). Sandstein 16:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is a misreading of the criteria, in my opinion. Per the WP:RS link "Self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources." The WWE is not a personal website, it's the website of the corporation involved that issues press releases on its content. Given that it has some level of control over these press releases, yes, they should be taken with a grain of salt and outside sources should be provided as a counterweight – but that does not necessitate a quickfail. Maybe I'm wrong though. I'm fairly interested, since I'll be reviewing December to Dismember (2006) later today, which is my first review of a sports event article. I'm going to bring it up on the WP:GAN talk page, since I'm usually wrong about these things. Cheers, CP 17:27, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment

As several users have stated on the WP:PW talkpage above, I have taken this to GAR to get further opinions. Davnel03 14:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further opinions have now been archived. There was no consensus to overturn the fail, so the article remains delisted. Geometry guy 12:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Un-needed Pictures

A lot of the pictures on here don't need to be here I think, pictures of Cena and Foley that aren't even during the event. It just seems stupid and a desperate attempt to get pictures into the article. Surely someone has some photos from the actual event? Mark handscombe 19:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. They don't. They can't just be "any old photo" either. And it's not a desperate attempt to get pictures into the article. Davnel03 17:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. It's not as bad as the article on the 1994 Royal Rumble, which features a picture of Scott Steiner from a few years ago (where he had cut his hair, dyed it blond, and pumped up using steroids). TJ Spyke 22:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 11, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

GA review (see here for criteria)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. -- LAX 20:16, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on ECW One Night Stand (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.wwe.com/shows/onenightstand/history/2006/matchesremove/2856498/results/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ECW One Night Stand (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081223101434/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/2006/articles/1150154542.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Balls Mahoney vs. Masato Tanaka

Small technicality, match wasn't announced as an Extreme Rules match, although hardcore weapons were used. Lbkid1700 (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]