Talk:Vaudreuil–Hudson line

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vaudreuil–Hudson line article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Canada: Quebec / Montreal Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Vaudreuil-Hudson Line (AMT).

New name

Now that the service has been cut back to Hudson, Quebec. a new name is in order. Like Dorion–Hudson Line (AMT)Montreal Gazette: "All aboard for the last train to Rigaud", April 23, 2010. Peter Horn User talk [19:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC) Peter Horn User talk 19:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

it is styled exo1 by exo --Cornellier (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Windsor Station

The history section is missing history. 76.66.192.55 (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 September 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to move, therefore, moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– While Exo has numbered their commuter rail lines, they have not abandoned the previous names. On this webpage the lines are listed it two places – once with the names (eg. Deux-Montagnes line), and once with the number and name (eg. exo6 - Deux-Montagnes line) but never with just the number. Even the official route map lists only the name (eg. Deux-Montagnes) with no mention of any numbers. Clearly the numbered names are not even the WP:OFFICIALNAMES, yet alone the WP:COMMONNAME which the Wikipedia articles should reflect.
More simply, the article title Saint-Jérôme line is much more descriptive to the average reader than EXO 2 or Exo2. BLAIXX 17:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AGREE I saw this is an obvious wrong move at the time but didn't have the time or energy to object. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looking at the website of the agency, it's clear that these are Line numberings, not total renamed. It's also pretty clear that "Exo" (and, no, per WP:MOSTM we do not use all lowercase spelling) is a service branding, not the name of the agency itself, and the move of the agency article from RTM to Exo was also a mistake born from over-enthusiasm resulting in jumping to conclusions instead of actually processing the actual situation. It appears analogous to the Chicago area, where the RTA is the agency that uses the Metra and Dash branding for their commuter trains and buses respectively, albeit one brand is used for both. At the very lest, these articles must be moved back. oknazevad (talk) 19:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Please move all articles back. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.