Talk:E language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Languages (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of standardized, informative and easy-to-use resources about languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject China (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Native name[edit]

The page does not mention the native name of the language, but ISO 639:e states that the native name is E. Could somebody confirm? Thank you. Lmaltier (talk) 20:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

It is pronounced something like "eughh"... Wikipedia's auto-capitalization of article titles may have caused confusion - "E" is the sound, not the latin letter. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 11:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Ergh, according to Chinese Wikipedia, that's for they call 'I' as 'E 55'. Like the Hak-ka-fa(Hakka), some people call it as 'ngai language'(涯話), for they call both '涯' and 'I'(我) as 'ngai'(with different tone). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.248.134.97 (talk) 13:24, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:E language/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 16:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)


I'll take this one. Looks both easy and a nice change from VG-related articles. --ProtoDrake (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Review[edit]

And... actually there is nothing I can see particularly wrong with it. It's a very nice read. This merits an Instant Pass. Congrats. --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:04, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Congrats and broken refs[edit]

Congrats on GA! I see there are some broken refs; would you like me to fix them? Notice how clicking on Edmondson 1992 in the Notes doesn't do anything (it should lead the reader to its citation further down in the References). Prhartcom (talk) 20:52, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

I went ahead and upgraded the reference format a bit. Hope you like it; if not, feel free to revert. Please double-check my work. (I notice the Infobox template generates footnotes 1 and 2: I saw in the template doc a way to suppress that if needed.) Nice job on the article. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 22:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Translation of Wusehua[edit]

I'm fairly new to studying Chinese but if I'm not mistaked the first character in Wusehua (五) is the number 5, making the name translate to "5 colours language". Can anyone who knows the language confirm?BobBobtheBob (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)