Talk:FC Bayern Munich Junior Team

FC Bayern Munich Junior Team was a Sports and recreation good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 17, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed

Football: Germany Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the German football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Germany: Munich Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Munich (assessed as High-importance).

Bavaria Low‑importance

	Bavaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Munich may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Bayern Munich Junior Team[edit]

I think the function of junior team article is talk about how success the youth system is, and no room for youth squads (except Bayern Munich II, which compete in profession league.) Matthew _hk t c 14:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bayern Munchen.png[edit]

Image:Bayern Munchen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bayern Munchen.png[edit]

Image:Bayern Munchen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bayern Munich Junior Team/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FAC} 11:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first GA review so I will not use the flashy icons other reviewers have. My initial thought is a fail, but I have asked for a second opinion. Going on to criteria:

1. Well-written

here the article has the most striking problems. References are generally not needed in lead, as everything in lead should be repeated in the article. Also, the lead could do with a copyedit. The image to the left is horribly displaced.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable

with references sparse and only to Bayern Munich is not good enough. Include references from books and news articles about the team. Try a search on google-books. I've used a book on La Masia which also talked about Bayern Munich.

3. Broad in its coverage

Insufficient coverage. Noted graduates are simply subjectively selected. Again see La Masia for how to use an objective selection criterion.

4. Neutral

Quite pro-Munich, but there are seldom controversies with youth academies. Should be better with use of 3rd party sources.

5. Stable

Seems so.

6. Illustration

not very good layout. See above.

I am not a really experienced GA reviewer, but I agree with the review above. Other details:

The "Noted Graduates" table has to go unless a good criterion and a source are given. (Sandman888 also mentioned this, but this is really important.)
All the championships below "Honours" should be sourced.
The current references need some more info (the publisher for 2, 3 and 4 is "Youth Profressional Training USA").
Why is the location (Säbener Straße) important for the article?
"The ll youth teams" what is meant by ll youth teams?
Reference 2 shows that the youth teams and the senior team location, but not that this is unique compared to other high profile clubs. This looks like OR.
The article says that Bayern Munich II "currently" plays in the 3rd liga. This may get out of date if the article is not updated, it is better to make this "as of the 2010–11 season".
The technical staff should be sourced, and a date should be given as of which the information was correct.
In the "Noted Graduates" table, don't use 1^st, but use 1st (per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (superscripts and subscripts)).
The "Overview" section is not really an overview, but more a hidden trivia section.

But even with these improvements, the article does not have enough third party sources, so I would advise the nominator to improve the article with the points given above, and take some time to find more sources. --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 07:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Per above I've failed the page. Take some time to re-write and nominate again. Sandman888 (talk) ^{Latest FAC} 10:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bayern Munich Junior Team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100530054921/http://www.fcbayern.telekom.de/en/teams/profis/04555.php to http://www.fcbayern.telekom.de/en/teams/profis/04555.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FC Bayern Munich Junior Team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]