Talk:Fail-fast system

Requested move 18 November 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Fail-fast system. – wbm1058 (talk) 13:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fail-fast → Fail-fast (information technology) – There is a very similarly named page Fail fast that is about business, which is confusing. I propose renaming that page too Vladimir Alexiev (talk) 09:50, 18 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. BegbertBiggs (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. — mw (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The current title appears to be an adjective. Per WP:NOUN, Fail-fast system (information technology) or Fail-fast system might be a better title. Dekimasuよ! 12:23, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Fail-fast system per Dekimasu. This appears to fall within systems engineering. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:09, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to being more clearly a noun and indicating the context, "Fail-fast system" would provide WP:NATURAL disambiguation. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 19:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got here from the other article -- I think fail-fast system is a better choice here. Both terms are used within the tech industry, so (business) vs (information technology) may not be of much help. Valereee (talk) 09:22, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Either could have a hyphen. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the other discussion. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Clear consensus to move, but no consensus for "system" vs "(information technology)". — mw (talk) (contribs) 19:29, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: No comments since the last relisting. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think fail-fast system is preferable for the natural disambiguation. BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:27, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support move to Fail-fast system per WP:NATDIS, WP:NOUN Wracking ^talk! 21:59, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.