Talk:Foggy (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 30 January 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 5 7 15:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Foggy → Foggy (disambiguation) – WP:TWODABS. Clear primary topic of "Foggy" is the adjective describing the condition of Fog. The cyclist may be great within his sport, but you can't really compete with the weather itself. A hatnote could also resolve any confusion here. bd2412 T 03:33, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather combine this disambiguation page with Fog (disambiguation) than add a hatnote on fog for the cyclist. older ≠ wiser 13:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
With respect to Bkonrad, I'd actually be inclined to support as proposed. I don't see any indication that we don't have a primary topic. Red Slash 04:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Carl Fogarty is clearly primary topic. Who is going to search on "foggy" if they want to look up fog? GregKaye 10:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably would have more to do with linking--"Captain Bob could not see the enemy ships approaching because of the [[foggy]] weather" Red Slash 01:45, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. As to Carl Fogarty being the primary topic, I doubt whether most people had ever heard of him prior to a recent reality TV show, and even fewer would have known his nickname! Pure recentism. As Red Slash says, it's the linking that's most relevant, not the fact people are likely to search for the term. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. The weather condition clearly wins on long term significance and common usage. — Amakuru (talk) 21:50, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Nicknamed "Foggy"

There's also Foggy Lyttle, Seymour Mullings -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]