Talk:Toole's Theatre
A fact from Toole's Theatre appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Infobox
[edit]In the infobox, we have fields for Opened, Closed and Years Active. The last gives the same info as the first two. Can we eliminate the repetition? Best regards, -- Ssilvers 16:19, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Folly Theatre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727081746/http://www.operetta-research-center.org/main.php?task=archart&cat=4&sub_cat=10&id=00090 to http://www.operetta-research-center.org/main.php?task=archart&cat=4&sub_cat=10&id=00090
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070703222809/http://www.gabrielleray.150m.com/ArchivePressText2003/20030503.html to http://www.gabrielleray.150m.com/ArchivePressText2003/20030503.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220200635/http://www.c20th.com/ppjmbarrie.htm to http://www.c20th.com/ppjmbarrie.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Title of article
[edit]I wonder if the present title is the best possible one? It seems to me that as the theatre was the Charing Cross Theatre for seven years, the Folly for five, and Toole's for fifteen, the last might be more helpful to the reader. I note that the well-known fan site Arthur Lloyd, The London Encyclopaedia, and the theatre historians Mander and Mitchenson have "Toole's Theatre" rather than "Folly Theatre" as their page/article/chapter headings. Grateful for people's thoughts on this. Tim riley talk 13:18, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- I do enjoy a good folly, but I can understand if you plump for the toole... I think the latter is probably the better of the two here. - SchroCat (talk) 20:42, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- A casual review of the sources gives the impression that Toole's is the more commonly used name. It's probably not a critical change, as the alternate names should still be redirects to this one, but I think Toole's has more support in sources. Schazjmd (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Would it not also be logical as the last name the theatre had before demolition? KJP1 (talk) 06:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- I too think Tooles would be better. I seem to remember reading about this theatre during my Frank Matcham revamp; I'll have to try and dig it out. CassiantoTalk 08:07, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Would it not also be logical as the last name the theatre had before demolition? KJP1 (talk) 06:02, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- A casual review of the sources gives the impression that Toole's is the more commonly used name. It's probably not a critical change, as the alternate names should still be redirects to this one, but I think Toole's has more support in sources. Schazjmd (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
Many thanks, colleagues, for those comments. I'll leave this thread open for a few days more and then, barring objections from any new contributors, I'll do the necessary. Tim riley talk 21:10, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- And now done. Tim riley talk 07:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)