Jump to content

Talk:Gülbahar Hatun (mother of Selim I)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Origin

[edit]

Her origin is debatable. This article claims she is from Trabzon and of Greek descent. The article Selim I claims she is from Kahramanmaraş and of Oghuz descent. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion about Gülbahar Hatun

[edit]

Gülbahar Hatun portrayed in the film Fetih (Conquest) 1453 is not the same as this person (Gülbahar Sultan) but is actually Emine Gülbahar (Ottoman Turkish: آمنة گلبهار), first wife of Sultan Mehmed II (Mehmet the Conqueror) and Valide Sultan to Sultan Bayezid II, whose wife is this person (Gülbahar Sultan). Hence Gülbahar Sultan is the second Gülbahar Hatun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ash wki (talkcontribs) 16:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The theory

[edit]

I have a theory about Gulbahar Hatun and Bayezid: 1. Ayse Hatun was wife of Bayezid II, mother of Selim I and nephew of Sitti Mukrime Hatun. If Mukrime was mother of Bayezid II, his marriage with Ayse Hatun would be incest and Selim would be deformed. 2. Gulbahar Hatun is widely regarded as Bayezid II's mother even in modern times. An example is a famous historical movie: Fetih 1453. 3. Sourcces that suport Mukrime Hatun theory are only two modern cites and they are low-reliable sources. 4. Bayezid II was born in 3 December 1447, while Mukrime Hatun was married to Mehmed II in 15 December 1449. Two years after Bayezid's birth. While Gulbahar Hatun was the first wife of Mehmed II and they married in 1446, a year before Bayezid II's birth. 5. Sitti Mukrime Hatun's wedding served as an alliance. And it wasn't in Mehmet II's liking. Probobly Mukrime was childles and died alone in the old palace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertBikaj (talkcontribs) 09:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why Stepmother???

[edit]

Selim's.I, biological mother "Gülbahar Sultan" died in 1510, only 10 years before Selim's own death in 1520.!

Thus Selim took no step-mother anymore LOL.


So many things are really very surprising that some write in Wikipedia.

Doe's no any have see it bevore?

Gülbahar Sultan was born in 1453 and died in 1510

Selim I. was born in 1470, he's reign was until 1512 since he's died in 1520.


Dilek2 (talk) 17:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Origin

[edit]

It's alredy sourced that Turkish origin is rejected by scholars. Don't add pseudo-history in behalf of your dreams.Psikomania (talk) 13:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gülbahar Hatun. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gülbahar Hatun (wife of Bayezid II). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Dulkadirid princess"

[edit]

@Sira Aspera, I see that you have been removing this category. I first thought you had reverted my addition of the category by mistake originally intending to revert other edits by IPs, but given you have specifically removed the category this time, I believe this requires a discussion, especially since you have not provided any explanation. Categories are meant to be helpful. The fact that there are different views or theories on where she was from does not disqualify her from getting categorized as being from the dynasty of Dulkadir. Aintabli (talk) 15:59, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]