Jump to content

Talk:Gersten Pavilion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 08:12, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gersten Pavilion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?

[edit]

The main content of this article is now about nine sentences or 117 words long. It does not seem to have changed much in the past 10 (!) years, so one wonders whether there is actually much more of interest to be said about Gerston Pavilion at all. In these circumstances, it isn't obvious what useful purpose the stub templates serve. I suspect that for the general reader they detract from the authority of the content that there is in the article as it stands. I'm only a wikignome and don't really know whether or how stub templates help other editors, but I've been bold and removed them. --Frans Fowler (talk) 01:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]