Talk:Guard rail

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Home Living Low‑importance

	Housing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Home Living, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of home-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Home LivingWikipedia:WikiProject Home LivingTemplate:WikiProject Home Livinghome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Stairs?

This article doesn't mention staris at all. Since it mentions railings on observation decks, I redirected Railing to here rather than to rail, but there should be a discussion somewhere of hand rails (which now links to rail). —BenFrantzDale 18:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hand rail is the appropriate article for people on foot, climbing stairs, on hiking trails, in stadiums, on observation decks, etc. Hand rails guard people against the danger of falling down. Do we really need to make any distinction between "hand rails" that are merely for the purpose of keeping people on line (queued up) and handrails that keep them from falling out of the upper deck? Wbm1058 (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Safety and industry section

Now I dont laugh easily, but i was in hysterics when the non-existant safety and industry section said the short section required expansion. (Willieboyisaloser 16:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)WillieboyisaloserWillieboyisaloser 16:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

And your point is...?

Be bold, find some appropriate references, and expand! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 19:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British vs. American usage

I suspect that "guard rail" in American English means the highway type, whereas in British English it includes the hand-rail variety. If my suspicion is correct, the article might be less confusing to both British and American readers if this were clarified in the lead. Ccrrccrr (talk) 22:03, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It would be better to keep the articles guarding people and guarding vehicles separate. The British guardrail article is over at traffic barrier. Don't they realize that barriers guard people too? ;) Wbm1058 (talk) 00:34, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance to get this sorted out? Right now the traffic barrier article is not even mentioned on Guardrail_(disambiguation), whereas this article is listed as "installed on road sides or medians (central reservations) for automobile safety", which doesn't match the current content. The confusion also affects the wikidata items. I agree with the suggestion to separate the "guarding people" and "guarding vehicles" variants.--Tobias K. (talk) 08:11, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guard rail is a broader concept which includes people and vehicles. The traffic barrier is specific to vehicles. The American term "guard rail" is basically the traffic barrier. The way with these two articles as they are now seems good. Guard rail has the main article link to traffic barrier when talking about automobiles. I fixed the disambiguation page to link to both articles. Z22 (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Height standards

The discussion is missing content regarding their effective heights for people. I've come across several older buildings that have portions closed off because the historical guardrails are too low and thus not up to code. Perhaps because we've gotten taller? I'm going to assume that heights are determined by measuring the average cg of drunk people to ensure they can't tip over them inadvertently. Hope someone can confirm this.--Hooperbloob (talk) 20:19, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One would have to quote current building codes. Peter Horn User talk 13:29, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Guard rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131105221006/http://otokorkuluk.net/eng/templer/galkon/guardrail-otokorkuluk-stands.asp to http://otokorkuluk.net/eng/templer/galkon/guardrail-otokorkuluk-stands.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flexible posts

Perhaps a section about flexible posts could be added. In Quebec they are often used in rows to separate roads from bicycle paths. [1] [2] [3] Peter Horn User talk 13:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, these are flexible bollards. Peter Horn User talk 21:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guard rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100418204852/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23674161-woman-cyclist-crushed-to-death-by-lorry-as-she-turns-corner.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23674161-woman-cyclist-crushed-to-death-by-lorry-as-she-turns-corner.do

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar and syntax issues

Grammar and syntax are little rough in a few places. While they don't affect substance, they do reflect on overall readability. I'll edit a few items, but a good editing once-over would improve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.73.213.182 (talk) 20:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automotive safety section is clearly an advertising stint.

Parts of this section need to be edited/removed as they are clearly advertising for Midwest Guardrail Systems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.148.176.70 (talk) 23:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Political Guardrails

I don't have any special expertise to discuss this, but I found this article due to the widespread use of a guardrail metaphor that is currently being used in American politics. Does it make sense to at least stub out a section on the metaphorical political use? I really do not mind contributing. It is just considering that I am likely not the only one to find this article in this way, I don't want to do anything that might compromise the integrity of an internet source that has been exceedingly useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.29.214.155 (talk)

I am not familiar with the metaphor usage in US politics, but Wikipedia is not a dictionary so I have linked to Wiktionary (our sister dictionary project) from the relevant disambiguation page. Does the "figurative, by extension" definition at wikt:guardrail match your use case? I am not sure what you meant by "stub out", but this article is purely about the barrier device. It could be possible to create a new article called Guardrail (metaphor), I am not sure how appropriate that is. Thanks for volunteering to contribute, we can always do with more help around here :-)--Commander Keane (talk) 18:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I understand that Wikipedia should not take any geographical perspectives, it certainly does not make sense to view this as simply a different dictionary definition. Guardrails were not a particularly common term in the US until about 10 years ago, when it became necessary to define the systems that kept politicians' whims from calamity. The guardrails metaphor made perfect sense. By stubbing out this article, I just meant adding another paragraph with a rough (readable) outline that could be filled in with someone with more experience than me. It would probably make more sense in a separate article though. I am positive that every nation on Earth has benefited from putting "guardrails" on their leaders, and an article detailing those guardrails would be useful 71.29.214.155 (talk) 19:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]