Jump to content

Talk:Gusen concentration camp

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Gusen concentration camp/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K.e.coffman (talk · contribs) 01:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing this article; will start shortly. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Points of clarification

[edit]
  • ...there were also large numbers of Spanish Republicans,... -- please consider linking "Spanish Republicans". BTW, Spanish Republican (singular) redirect to Second Spanish Republic. I was not sure this would be the link you might want, so I did not link it myself.
    • Done
  • This is a bit awkward: Most Austrians… [in 1918] & the Austrian people achieved their goal… [in 1938] -- this implies to me that the very same Austrians advocated for the same goal twenty years apart. In addition, "the Austrian people" implies nationality rather than ethnicity; many of Austrian citizens probably did not want a union with Nazi Germany, especially not the Jewish population.
    • Fixed
  • The first prisoners and guards moved in on 25 May 1940, officially opening the camp. -- suggest "The camp was officially opened on 25 May 1940, when the first prisoners and guards moved in". Otherwise, it reads like the inmates opened the camp.
    • Done, thanks
  • Because of the harsh conditions and mass murder, one group of prisoners would die to be replaced by another. -- this is awkward, as "would" implies a future time and / or that there was causality between replacements and harsh conditions. I think what this sentence is trying to say is: SS did not care about high mortality due to abysmal conditions; they could simply replace the dead.
    • The source does not really say that, it emphasizes the waves/groups of prisoners. I changed it to One group of prisoners would die, but the number was maintained due to transports of incoming prisoners.
  • ...were transported to the main camp to be gassed... -- does the "main camp" refer to Mauthausen or Gusen I?
    • Mauthausen, clarified
  • known as "death group" due to the high mortality rate -- known to whom?
    • Source does not say, so I took this out.
  • This "murderous brainstorming" was... -- I assume it's a direct quote from the source. If so, it's better to attribute, i.e. This "murderous brainstorming", in the words of the historian X, was....
    • done
  • where fire brigade members were very willing to surrender... -- if the (local) firemen were serving as guards then this should be mentioned. Otherwise, it's unclear what firemen were doing at the camp.
    • First mentioned in the SS command section but I added clarification here.

--K.e.coffman (talk) 23:35, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

--K.e.coffman (talk) 02:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Self-published book

[edit]

@AHDG: The Haunschmied et al. is a self-published book, which means it should be used with caution if at all. Unfortunately, it got a rather negative review.[1] Regardless of how we feel about Haunschmied's efforts to commemmorate the camp, Wikipedia should only use sources that meet WP:RS. Also, any added information should respect the article's existing format. buidhe 23:26, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Neander, Joachim (26 October 2008). "St. Georgen Gusen Mauthausen: Concentration Camp Mauthausen Reconsidered (review)". The Journal of Military History. 72 (4): 1319–1320. doi:10.1353/jmh.0.0139. ISSN 1543-7795.

There is a typo

[edit]

Volkssturm is incorrectly spelled "Volksstrum"

Concentration Camp for Poles

[edit]

The camp during its long existence was mainly for the Polish people. Because of that the official name of the camp was “Vernichtungslager fur die Polnische Intelligenz”. 27 000-35 000 Poles died there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.104.90.5 (talk) 04:59, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]