Talk:Harry Strom

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articleHarry Strom has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 10, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Hi all[edit]

Hi all - I think page is great, and it is up to date with proper sourcing! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dissonance cognitive (talkcontribs) 02:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Harry Strom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of August 10, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Written in a clear and understandable manner for the reader.
2. Factually accurate?: Duly cited to WP:RS/WP:V sources throughout. I made some very minor copyedits and layout edits only. I split up the References subsection into Notes/References, per WP:LAYOUT, but that was pretty much all, everything else was fine.
3. Broad in coverage?: Article is thorough, covering many aspects of the individual's life and laid out in an organized format and flow.
4. Neutral point of view?: Article appears to be written in a neutrally worded manner.
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: One image used (in infobox) detailed fair use rationale provided on image page, no problems here.
 If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 01:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Harry Strom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]