Jump to content

Talk:Hawaiian Airlines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:29, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet Section

[edit]

In an effort to make Wikipedia more consistent, I edited the Fleet section of Hawaiian Airlines to meet the guidelines of Wikiproject Airlines. This layout is the preffered layout and is easier to read in most cases. It is smaller and more compact. Before making such drastic changes, you should ALWAYS reach a consensus with other editors.--Golich17 (talk) 02:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Korean

[edit]

Someone needs to write a Korean page.

When that is done, use http://www.hawaiianairlines.co.kr/ContactUs.aspx to cite the HQ WhisperToMe (talk) 05:13, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the source to cite the HQ address on their main site: http://www.hawaiianair.com/Aboutus/Pages/CorporateContact.aspx -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, that one is great to use as the HQ source for any English pages. WhisperToMe (talk) 07:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source

[edit]

Hawaiian has never had a fatal accident in its entire history and is the oldest US carrier with such a distinction

— At the foreword

Would you please add the source of this? Above-cited foreword need to the Source by WP:SOURCE. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 10:42, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a source for that line. Quote from the airline's own history page:

In 1990 the international travel and hospitality publication Condé Nast Traveler rated Hawaiian Airlines one of the world's safest airlines. In an exclusive 20 year study (August 1990 issue), Condé Nast noted that Hawaiian was one of only five U.S. carriers, along with four with relatively short histories, that had never had an air fatality in their entire histories. Eighteen years later, Hawaiian's record of safety continues unbroken.

Musashi1600 (talk) 11:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, sir. :) --Idh0854 (talk) 12:52, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag carrier

[edit]

By following the link it quickly becomes obvious that Hawaiian does not meet the requirement to be a flag carrier as defined by Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.254.71.142 (talk) 03:56, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Intro paragraph rewrite needed

[edit]

The introduction to this article, specifically the second paragraph needs some serious editing to make it a neutral piece. Right now the whole thing reads like an advertisement for the company. By the way I only happened to be linked to this page from an advertisement they posted on reddit masquerading as an average post, so manipulating wikipedia as well seems like something that might happen too. The 2nd intro paragraph is one positive spin after another, and like the reddit post, isn't particularly subtle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.110.72 (talk) 06:27, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The link given as a citation for the Kahului hub is a San Jose Mercury article on Delta in San Jose, and makes no mention of either Hawaiian Airlines or Kahului Airport.Avman89 (talk) 18:52, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out. I initially replaced the bad source with a "citation needed" template but then found a suitable source in one of Hawaiian's old press releases (see [1]), so I updated the source accordingly. 青い(Aoi) (talk) 04:32, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hawaiian Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delta and Korean codeshares

[edit]

Is there a source for the information that the codeshares with Delta and Korean Airlines are ending? I can't find anything to substantiate this. Mirza Ahmed (talk) 00:29, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ATR-42s operated by Empire Airlines

[edit]

Should they not be included in the fleet table? They are owned by Hawaiian, and used exclusively for Hawaiian-branded flights. The fact that they are operated by Empire Airlines shouldn't matter. For comparison, Alaska Airlines-owned E175s flown by SkyWest are included in the fleet table on Alaska's page. Mirza Ahmed (talk) 11:46, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Interline agreement

[edit]

Can it still be said that Hawaiian has an interline agreement with South African even if the two don’t have anything close to common destinations at this point?71.166.42.116 (talk) 04:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alaska Air Group acquisition

[edit]

As exciting as this prospective deal may be to some people, it has not officially gone through, so please refrain from using the crystal ball to include aspects from the deal in the infobox. Virtually every acquisition/merger has this mistake made and Hawaiian Airlines is no exception. BOTTO (TC) 18:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like we're still struggling with this. To the contributors to this info - @RickyCourtney, Lucthedog2, 66.8.192.6, Jogosoccer, Brotherchristmas, TarkusAB, Amtraknortheast1, CheckeredYeti, MSG17, AnDeargMor, Lajurgen, SounderBruce, and 98.226.248.42: 98.227.14.7 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) - look, whenever there's an announced transaction like this, people jump the gun and add the content to the infobox, usually with "(pending)" and it's always taken down, per WP:CRYSTAL. The articles pertaining to this subject matter already has comprehensive text covering the topic, so we should let it be until the deal moves forward. There are still a thousand hurdles for these companies to clear first. BOTTO (TC) 14:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i understand and i just helped by finding another offender Lucthedog2 (talk) 03:52, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
this good to know as people 41.114.180.147 (talk) 12:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This section strongly implies that Alaska Air Group will operate Hawaiian as a separate entity. The statements from both airlines talk about a combined airline using multiple brands but with a single head office in Seattle and merged labor pools. Perhaps this should be clarified. Name Omitted (talk) 05:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Name Omitted: It certainly should be clarified. I've poured over the sources and I still cannot decipher whether Alaska will operate two separate airlines permanently or merge them shortly after, like what happened with Virgin America. Maybe it's best if we just leave it be until further clarification is provided by Alaska. BOTTO (TC) 14:07, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]