Talk:Hit-Girl

Comics: Films Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Comic book films work group.

Film: Comic book

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Comic book films task force.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Needs improvements

There's still a lot that could be added to this article such as info on merchandise, character bio, info about Kick-Ass 2, etc. I was hoping that other editors who knew more about those things than I do could help out. For An Angel (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

comics and movies

The article needs more on comparison and contrast of the character of the comics and the character of the movies, just like the Kick-Ass character article does. Gringo300 (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mindy's Age

What exactly is Mindy's age? In KA2 (comic) she is referred to as being 11, yet in Hit Girl (which is set before KA2) she is referred to as being 12. (46.204.72.134 (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2013 (UTC))[reply]

I'm actually relieved that I'm not the only person who noticed this. Obviously, the ages were reversed. Gringo300 (talk) 07:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When the movie came out, the actress was 13 years, 1 month, and 2 days old. There's your answer. --Nosehair2200 (talk) 02:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 August 2014

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. I'll start a new discussion about moving this article to simply Hit-Girl as that suggestion generated a lot of support in this RM but really needs to have a proper multi-move discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 11:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hit-Girl (character) → Hit-Girl (comics) – Per WP:NCC, the character article should be moved to Hit-Girl (comics), and the article about the comic book already at that title should be moved to Hit-Girl (comic book). – Fortdj33 (talk) 13:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Steel1943 (talk) 14:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just reviewed WP:NCC regarding if the character article should be at the title with the "(comics)" disambiguator; according to my interpretation of the page, that disambiguator should only be used in the event that it is the only article related to comics, which it is not since the comic book article exists. (I may be interpreting this in a manner that others don't, but from what I saw on WP:NCC, the disambiguator "(comics)" is mentioned at the top of the guideline, then not mentioned again.) However, I left the Hit-Girl (comic book) redirect I created intact since it is a proper redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 13:38, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Fortdj33: In addition to what I just said in my last comment, I would actually say that most likely, the subject of the article currently at Hit-Girl (character) may be the primary topic for the term "Hit-Girl" (per the other existing entries on the disambiguation page Hit-Girl). Steel1943 (talk) 13:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per my comments above, I oppose the proposed move per the current wording of WP:NCC, but support moving Hit-Girl (character) to Hit-Girl and moving Hit-Girl to Hit-Girl (disambiguation). Steel1943 (talk) 14:00, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree that the character article is probably the primary topic, so I would support moving Hit-Girl (character) to Hit-Girl and moving Hit-Girl to Hit-Girl (disambiguation). But, I only suggested moving the comic book article, because Hit-Girl (comics) was already in use. If the character article is not going to use "(comics)" as the disambiguation, then the comic book article should instead. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:10, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

support, either of the moves mentioned above with slight preference for Hit-Girl (comics) Gregkaye (talk) 14:59, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose NCC makes it very ambiguous to the general reader as to the topic of this article, so seems to fail WP:CRITERIA in this case. WP:RF we are not serving the readership with ambiguously disambiguating characters from eponymous comic books. Other character articles on Wikipedia use "(character)" so the comics schema is inconsistent with the topic of fictional characters. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- NOTE I think the discussion at talk:Wolverine (character) may have bearing on this discussion -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 06:26, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this obviously tendentious move request. I mean, for Christ's sake, the "Film" section is longer than the "Comics" section! I'm not opposed to a move to Hit-Girl, as it is clearly the WP:PRIMARY subject—Hit Girl (song) is unhyphenated, and thus dealt with best with a hatnote.
Of course, what's worst about this move is the fact that it was a stealth tendentious edit done in response to the discussion at Wolverine (character)—proposed as an Uncontroversial technical request made less than an hour after I'd pointed out Kick-Ass (character). It's obvious what Fortdj33 is trying to do, and if this editor doesn't cut out this crap, I will take it straight to WP:ANI. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 07:01, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:PRECISION - the title should be sufficiently precise to unambiguously identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects, which doesn't happen between (comics) and (comic book). Take a look at the related Kick-Ass, which does the right thing: Kick-Ass (comics) for the comic and Kick-Ass (character) for the character. Turning those around doesn't make sense.

I agree with moving this article to Hit-Girl, it gets way more than ten times the number of page hits of the other two pages combined (which would be the bare minimum to have a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC with respect to usage). Diego (talk) 07:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move II

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Page moved: per discussion Ground Zero | t 15:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hit-Girl (character) → Hit-Girl
Hit-Girl → Hit-Girl (disambiguation)

– Procedural nomination, see the RM directly above. I am neutral. Pinging editors involved in the previous discussion: Fortdj33, Steel1943, Gregkaye, 65.94.169.222, Curly Turkey, Diego Moya. Jenks24 (talk) 11:55, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per my comments above, I support moving Hit-Girl (character) to Hit-Girl and moving Hit-Girl to Hit-Girl (disambiguation). In addition, if the character article is not going to use "(comics)" as the disambiguation, then Hit-Girl (comic book) should be moved to Hit-Girl (comics). Fortdj33 (talk) 12:05, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my comments above. Steel1943 (talk) 12:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support the proposed move per previous discussion, unless someone shows that any one of the other articles has a similar claim to being significant. Oppose moving Hit-Girl (comic book) to Hit-Girl (comics) per WP:PRECISION. Diego (talk) 15:44, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per previous discussion. Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 20:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support as better than Hit-Girl (character). I would have had the slightest of preferences for Hit-Girl (comics) but that moot point. The option chosen is good. Gregkaye (talk) 21:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "(comics)" the comic book should not use that disambiguator, as the character is also a comics subject, so both the comic book and character are "comics" making the disambiguator "comics" ambiguous. support making the character the primary topic. -- 65.94.169.222 (talk) 04:38, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment re: (comic book) vs (comics)---I think we should open a discussion at the WP:COMICS talk page about this. My gut reaction was that the Hit-Girl comic book should remain at (comic book), but thinking about it, I don't think the publishing format is necessarily the best dab to use---after all, years after the series ceases, it will likely remain in print in collected form (call it graphic novels or TPBs or what have you). I doubt this is limited to 'Hit-Girl. (comics), however, could be parsed as Hit-Girl in comics, which is not the intended scope (unless someone wants to rewrite the article from that angle---I won't comment whether that's appropriate or not). Curly Turkey ⚞¡gobble!⚟ 09:46, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Chloe's age as of filming

On this article it claims Chloe was 11 at the time of filming Kick-Ass, however the filming would have happened in the end months of 2009, making her at least 12 years old nearly 13. Easy math if you look at her birthday, which is Feb 10 1997. It needs fixing up.121.74.147.60 (talk) 11:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When the movie came out, the actress was 13 years, 1 month, and 2 days old. Nosehair2200 (talk) 02:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hit-Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110815091232/http://e-edition.metroherald.ie/2010/04/14/ to http://e-edition.metroherald.ie/2010/04/14/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Hit-Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://m.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/mar/21/jane-goldman-screenwriter-kick-ass?cat=film&type=article
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1630006/story.jhtml
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1262331/Kick-Ass-child-star-Chloe-Moretz-says-mother-allowed-say-C-word-controversial-film.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714122241/http://www.moviefreak.com/artman/publish/interviews_markmillar.shtml to http://www.moviefreak.com/artman/publish/interviews_markmillar.shtml
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110624124437/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/your-movie-sucks.html to http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/your-movie-sucks.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]