Talk:Honey (Bobby Goldsboro album)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:56, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Honey (album) → Honey (Bobby Goldsboro album) – There's a bunch of albums with this name 98.214.255.63 (talk) 19:56, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support (in spirit): Suggest move to Honey (Bobby Goldsboro album). —BarrelProof (talk) 21:28, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Honey (Bobby Goldsboro). Definitely not a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, sub or otherwise. --BDD (talk) 00:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support move to Honey (Bobby Goldsboro album). older ≠ wiser 01:10, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Honey (Bobby Goldsboro album) - BDD, did you miss something? Red Slash 01:27, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - (I have amended RM template to include "d" and "album" as IP surely intended). Thanks to article creator User:Delangle9 for the new article; I will add cover. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, if I could have, I would have bet literally everything I own on you supporting this move, In ictu oculi

Red Slash 01:37, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm not one of those who opposes WP:NCM for sure. I suggest the next visitor or User:Delangle9 goes ahead and does it as an uncontroversial move. I will check to update the image free use record. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support - As the creator I have copied and renamed "Honey (Album)" to "Honey (Bobby Goldsboro Album)", but being new to Wiki I don't known if this was the correct way to go about it. The old "Honey (album)" entry now needs deleting. However, so many of my entries get a "not notable - deletion" tag I'm seriously thinking of giving this lark up.Delangle9 (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Just for the record, yes, I did miss something, Red Slash! --BDD (talk) 17:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]