Jump to content

Talk:Irving Kane Pond

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleIrving Kane Pond has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 30, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 16, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Irving Pond (pictured) designed three National Historic Landmarks, performed a backflip on his 80th birthday, and scored the first ever touchdown for the Michigan Wolverines?

Cause of death?

[edit]

The man seemed to be relatively healthy even at the age of 80 according to the article. I'm curious, what was the cause of his death, disease wise? 72.229.156.157 (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Irving Kane Pond/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Redtigerxyz Talk 14:54, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Sections "Architectural style and philosophy" and "Role in the Chicago school" are looking like quotefarms. See WP:QUOTE for converting quotes into prose. Are the two quotes in "University of Michigan" necessary? IMO, the first one can be easily incorporated into prose.
I followed your recommendation with the exception of the quotes in which Pond himself explains key elements of his architectural philosophy. I feel those quotes, which are from a public domain work, should not simply be paraphrased and that it is best to keep the full quotes. I think your advice was on point on the other sections. Cbl62 (talk) 05:43, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All images except are File:Irving Pond Backflip.jpg are OK. The fair use rationale of File:Irving Pond Backflip.jpg is invalid as there can other images in the world, which can used to document Pond's later years. Also text can effectively have the same effect of the photo. No free-equivalent clause is violated. So Removed it.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
  • The first thing that strikes me is that the section Biography takes up most of the article, which does not follow WP:Layout. It would be much more readable if this huge section were broken down into relevant sections, based on different stages of his life, which would easy to navigate through a TOC. Reorganize the sections. Proposed sections (better titles can be found):
    • Early life (1857-1879): Early years, University of Michigan
    • As an Architect
    • Author etc.
I like what you did. Thanks for the assistance. Cbl62 (talk) 05:44, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Convert the bullets in "Eagle's Nest and related activities" convert in paras. More readable On Second thoughts, the bullets are acceptable in this case.
  • There is a little inconsistency in the references. for eg. Ref 6 has the whole info for the book, ref 9 does not. Add the whole info to all references. Follow a consistent format as in Wikipedia:Citing_sources#How_to_present_citations (Footnotes/Shortened footnotes format).
I am adding the long footnotes format throughout. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK by me. Thanks. Cbl62 (talk) 05:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The references lack publisher info, which is needed for a reader to easily track a book. Add publisher info and ISBN.
Ref 6 still misses a page number. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Cbl62 (talk) 05:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Lead does not fully summarize the article, also does not follow the chronology. Rewrite the lead per WP:LEAD.
I have significant expanded the introduction following the chronology of the article, which I believe provides a fair summary of the article. Cbl62 (talk) 06:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The date of death needs a ref. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to have more info about Pond's death. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:03, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I paid to retrieve his obituary from the Chicago Daily Tribune and have now added information on his cause of death as well as citation for the date of death. Cbl62 (talk) 06:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA PASS Excellent job. I must say I enjoyed reading and reviewing this article. Congrats. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:41, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irving Kane Pond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Irving Kane Pond. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Irving_Kane_Pond&oldid=1212457443"