Jump to content

Talk:Jack van Tongeren

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

I removed a bunch of poorly-spelt bigoted nonsense.Ordinary Person 03:38, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Something to add

[edit]

He was arrested again in 2004. [1] [2]. Seems to have been found guilty and sent back to jail [3] though I haven't found anything official on that.

A more important omision is the fact that he was/is the leader of the Australian National Movement. (ANM). There are some photos and quite a bit of information at [4]. Regards, Ben Aveling 06:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

removed this quote;

'As with every almost other member that NA has ever had, Jack quit and went off to form his own organisation, believing NA were being soft on Jews.'

This is not NPOV and is unprovable. I highly doubt over 50% of NA members attempted to form new right wing parties. If I'm wrong, please cite evidence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PaganSocialist (talkcontribs) 10:57, 3 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

somewhat hilariously, itss truer than you might imagine. Everybody wants to be fuhror in the australian fascist scene Duckmonster (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Art

[edit]

Nothing about his hobby as an artist, and the fact that many of his paintings have sold for large amounts of money? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.45.211 (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Could I suggest that the link to the "kangaroo reich" be marked as a ultra-right conspiracy page. The author Jim Saleam, while quite an articulate man, is the other main australian Neo Nazi leader, and has been charged with some fairly serious terror incidents himself (ordered a shotgun attack on a representative of the african national congress). Duckmonster 05:04, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as a contemporary white supremacist

[edit]

I've added Jack van Tongeren to White_supremacy#Contemporary_white_supremacists. Cheers, CWC(talk) 12:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Military History

[edit]

This person was a soldier once but neither that is the reason why he has article nor anything of his service time is mentioned. Thus, until some new information is added to the artilce why he should be under WikiMilHist he has been removed. Ikokki 23:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I have removed content, here, that dated back to an edit on 3 March 2006, here. It appears it was originally copied from The Age newspaper here. Several sentences were still unaltered from that date! Content can go back if re-written in "own words" per WP guidelines, and properly cited, which it wasn't as it had no footnotes. 220 of Borg 21:15, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack van Tongeren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article importance

[edit]

I don’t agree that the article rates a “low” importance for the WA project. These crimes are still remembered within the community some 20-30 years after occurring. It caused significant racial tensions during the late 1980s. Adondai (talk) 03:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]