Talk:Jilla

jilla

Steviebarrard (talk) 07:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Not done: no actual request made here. NiciVampireHeart 11:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 December 2013

The film has 5 songs 2 karoake and 1 theme song

1. Pattu Onnu

  Singers: S.P.Balasubramaniam, Shankar Mahadevan

  Lyrics: Yugabharathi

2. Verasa Pogayile

  Singer: vijay

  Lyrics: Parvathy

3. Jingunamani

  Singers: K.G. Ranjith, Sunidhi Chauhan

  Lyrics: Viveka

4. Kandaangi Kandaangi

  Singers: Vijay, Shreya Ghoshal

  Lyrics: Vairamuthu

5. Yeppa Maama Treatu?

  Singers: D. Imman, A.V Pooja, Snigdha Chandra

  Lyrics: Viveka

6. Jilla Theme

  Singers: Santhosh Hariharan, Deepak, Anand, Shenbagaraj

  Lyrics: Viveka

7. Kandangi Kandangi Karaoke track

8. Verasa Pogayile Karaoke track

Soundtrack album To Jilla by D.Imman

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Dark Sun (talk) 17:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Already done Dark Sun (talk) 17:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 January 2014

Karthik5b8 (talk) 04:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

• Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. Technical 13 (talk) 05:36, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2014

Please change Kajal Agarwal to Kajal Aggarwal 124.153.65.242 (talk) 08:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Have changed the spelling to avoid a redirect Arjayay (talk) 09:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 9 January 2014

2.50.211.1 (talk) 18:43, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Reception

The film received negative reviews.Behindwoods gave 1/5 and stated that Neason and Vijay delivered a commercial entertainer with success in parts .Movie crow rated 1/5 and stated that people who like realistic movies please stay away.India glitz gave 3.25/5 stating justice delivered and Jilla is a perfect pongal entertainer for all audiences.sify gave 4/5 and stated it is a mass entertainer as compared to other pongal releases

Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2014

the film opened to mostly positive reviews from critics and audience. Kisan-S (talk) 21:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --ElHef (Meep?) 01:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2014

This movie has received mixed to negative reviews from critics and audience. 59.177.2.151 (talk) 04:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: No, the reviews are certainly going in "highly positive". The ratings cited are 2.75/5, 3/5, 3.75/5, 3.5/5, 3.5/5 and 4.5/5. These are clearly mixed, and only one is really positive. Arjayay (talk) 13:06, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2014

78.101.199.241 (talk) 14:52, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: No request was made. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:31, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2014

the document present is not correct 78.101.199.241 (talk) 17:00, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: Exactly as your post above, you have made no edit request.
This should take the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", so it is unclear what you want changed.
Furthermore, you will need to cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information can be added to this article. - Arjayay (talk) 17:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

Copy of entire article was pasted here Srijithshaji (talk) 09:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: I have removed your repeat of the entire article.

If you wish to make a request, do this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ", so it is clear what you want added.
Furthermore, you will need to cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information can be added to this article. - Arjayay (talk) 12:08, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

kindly change the crictical reception properly . it got many positive reviews only 117.216.114.234 (talk) 11:48, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: This article seems to be a battleground between different fan groups, some of which are inventing high review ratings, whilst others are adding very low ratings. Numbers from 0.5/5 to 4.5/5 have been used. Quotations are also being invented to support each sides view. If this carries on, several users will be blocked.

Having checked the articles referred to, the actual figures are:-

• Times of India - 3.5
• Indiaglitz - 3.25
• Behindwoods - 2.75
• Bangalore Mirror - 3.5
• Movie Crow - 3.0
• Sify - 3.0
• Breaking - 3.25
• Chennai Vision = "Good"
• Hindustan Times - no rating
  

These reviews average out at 3.175 / 5 which is not particularly high. They are also "mixed" which is what the article currently, and correctly, says.
Arjayay (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

[deleted a magnet for unnecessary editing --Geniac (talk) 17:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)] Rsidd1111 (talk) 13:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

|}

Not done: Please be specific in what change needs to be made. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 13:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

change mohanlal name to shivan and soori to gopal 117.202.186.59 (talk) 13:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Done Thanks. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 15:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

the film received only positive reviews from critics and audience

117.202.186.59 (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC) Not done: - No it did not - please see the explanation under the second request for 12 January, above. Arjayay (talk) 14:02, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2014

Please change "positive to mixed" to positive Soccerboss (talk) 15:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: See discussion above. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:21, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014

Wherever "positive reviews" should have been written, it's written positive. It's a grammatical error, add the word review after "positive" 120.59.9.147 (talk) 04:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: "Positive to mixed reviews" is grammatically correct. This means the reviews ranged from positive to mixed in quality. --Anon126 (talk - contribs) 06:01, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014

This movie has released with highly positive reviews. But in the introduction section it is written "generally positive to mixed". Please change it highly positive. Your references in the reception section is a proof and you are writing positive to mixed? Please this is Wikipedia, write genuinely 120.59.9.147 (talk) 06:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: This has been requested numerous times, and turned down every time, Please read all the explanations above. Arjayay (talk) 08:28, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014

jilla is mokka film of 2014 C.duraikutty (talk) 14:47, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Not done: This may be the English Wikipedia, but we can still look up Tamil slang words like Mokka. - Arjayay (talk) 17:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Boxoffice--edit request on 14th January 2014

Plz create boxoffice section for this page with the content below.

Jilla collected a whopping 10 croes excluding Malaysia and Uk in first 2 days . It grossed 16.5 croes in tamil nadu ,5.3 croes in kerala which is touted to be the highest for a film in Malayalam film industry and 2 croes in Andhra. And it topped the chennai boxoffice by collectiong 2.72 croes in its first weekend with 97% theater occupancy .

References

Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2014

Nareshnaru (talk) 21:28, 15 January 2014 (UTC) Plz update the worldwide collection and not just india collections in box-office.

Not done: please make your request in a "change X to Y" format. Please provide the specific edit you are requesting. RudolfRed (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 February 2014

Note: Removed a forked copy of the article from this space. --ElHef (Meep?) 18:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2014

180.151.123.9 (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: No request was made. --ElHef (Meep?) 18:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2016

jilla overall collection source from forbes http://forbesindia.com/celebprofile2014/vijay/81

1.23.18.132 (talk) 19:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Done EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

jilla boxoffice collection fake.

Metromasti is not a reliable source. According to ibtimes jilla grossed 85 crore worldwide. Athulnandu (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Bro jilla collection is 92cr according to indian movie stats and imdb so don't spread fake Dhoni99984 (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

@Dhoni99984: Neither "indian movie stats" or "imdb" are reliable sources. See WP:RS and WP:RS/IMDB. And maybe it's not useful to reply to 3-year-old conversations? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:39, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2017

Edit 1: After the section "As of 5 February. 2014, the film had earned ₹85 crore at the box office" Add the below lines with sources.

The total collection for this movie has reached 105 Crores in the first few week itself. It become one of the movies of that year to reach 100 Crore mark.

Sources: https://www.facebook.com/ayngaran/posts/741569859189373 http://www.metromasti.com/kollywood/news/Jilla-movie-joins100-crore-club-box-office-collections-worldwide/37073

Edit 2: Edit the total collection to 105 Crores. Thiruvetti (talk) 20:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Not done: "The film Jilla has surpassed 100 crore within few days which includes Satellite rights, distribution rights and domestic gross." The phrase "box office" only refers to receipts at movie theaters, not satellite etc.; the source you provide isn't sufficient for this change. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

ET exemption rejected

Please add the following content under Box Office.

The film attracted entertainment tax as its application for exemption was rejected on 10th January 2014.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.174.64.78 (talk) 22:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

References

 Not done: "Attracted entertainment tax" is not the correct way in English to word this claim.  Spintendo  02:13, 22 November 2018 (UTC)