Jump to content

Talk:Jim Hobbins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Jim Hobbins/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 15:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:47, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Comments

[edit]
  • I archived the reference links.
  • I'm not sure his exact GPA is relevant.
    • Removed.
  • In the infobox, I think games played is enough. Just my opinion tho.
  • You need to clarify his replacement contract was also with the Packers. It is assumed, but not clear.
    • Clarified.
  • Although some projected him as a mid-to-late round pick who? Scouts? Sportswriters?
    • The source just says that he was "told he was a potential mid-to-late round pick" - I just stated that he went unselected.
  • he was at the age of 34 the oldest player on the team --> he was the oldest player on the team at the age of 34
    • Changed.
  • they had their first child later that year, "first" implies more than one. If that isn't know, then just say "they had a child later that year".
    • Changed.
  • Ref spot check: #2, 5, 8, 12, 20, 21

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 15:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by BeanieFan11 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Jim Hobbins; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]