Talk:KVZK-TV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The station isn't exactly "absent" from the FCC database; it's listed as "assigned to the U. S. Government." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpschaaf (talkcontribs) 13:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 October 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Not likely to be controversial. Raymie (tc) 18:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Raymie (tc) 18:44, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]



KVZK-2KVZK-TV – Now one station Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Mvcg66b3r: I actually have a G6 out for this to be moved there. The availability of programming information is scarce. Just to get technical info, I'm emailing OPI. This is one station with multiple channels in a way that breaks every US norm, and media references consistently call it KVZK-TV. It actually appears to now be one 6 MHz multiplex on RF 5, but I'm not sure on that. Raymie (tc) 04:29, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Quite happy to complete the page deletion for the G6 - just make sure it is per comsensus before the move happens. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:35, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 01:05, 25 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I prefer ALT1. On ALT2, I didn't see "the longest in the Pacific" in the source. It still reads well without the phrase. Excellent 5x expansion and a great read. Royalbroil 02:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks Royalbroil, I ended up removing that part of ALT2. I could have sworn it was in another source but alas... Raymie (tc) 03:35, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]