Talk:Karyn Calabrese

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative Views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Seems notable - borderline WP:BLP1E

I think we've enough here to meet WP:BIO, though we're bordering on a WP:BLP1E situation. She's known for her restaurants and promoting raw food. She promotes herself as much more, but we need to be wary of following her press.

We need to watch the WP:FRINGE, bordering on WP:MEDRS, claims she makes about the foods she sells.

The article needs better sources. A well-researched article or biography about her from a reliable source would be ideal. I'm unclear on who, if anyone, approved this article for creation, nor can I find the comments on why it was rejected for creation. Most of the sources are questionable.

We might want to get some help from WP:Food. There has to be some WP:GA and WP:FA articles on similar people. Seems like her restaurants could be almost as notable as she. --Ronz (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BLP sources

I recently tagged this article with the BLP template given its lack of reliable sources and the other section on this Talk page citing these concerns since 2014. An IP user reverted the tag placement, and this action seems a bit odd. That user has made edits previously to this article but in a promotional manner, and this user's list of contributions appears to be focused on pushing FRINGE POVs. Delta13C (talk) 06:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delta13C I see plenty of sources, most are mainstream, like Chicago Tribune, livestrong, zagat. I can't vouch for cuisinenoir nor windycity live, but the article isn't a puff piece, in fact, the article says a lot less than the sources do. I don't think the tag is valid. KoshVorlon 17:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KoshVorlon I agree that the Chicago Tribune source is reliable and suitable for BLP, but are you sure that Livestrong and Zagat are reliable sources? The Zagat sources are reviews of the restaurants, and the LIvestrong piece is about her specific "detox diet," which does not bear on BLP. I am not convinced that the article has enough sources to pass WP:BLP. Delta13C (talk) 07:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delta13C Zagat is reliable and therefore is usable, Livestrong is also reliable. Like I said, I see references in here enough to satisfy the requirements, but I want to hear from others as well. KoshVorlon 12:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KoshVorlon I am pretty sure that a Content farm like Livestrong.com is not a reliable source. Zagat reviews are pretty much self-published content. Regardless, the information contained in these sources does not provide biographical information about the subject of this article. Therefore, they are not helping this article meet the hurdle of WP:BLP. Delta13C (talk) 13:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delta13C Zagat is definetly not "self-published", Zagat are very coveted reviews, it's reliable, and Live Strong is a reliable organization (despite Lance Armstrong ). Far as I can tell it satisfies the requirements of BLP KoshVorlon 20:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karyn Calabrese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160605041140/http://chicagoist.com/2015/12/14/what_the_heck_is_going_on_with_kary.php to http://chicagoist.com/2015/12/14/what_the_heck_is_going_on_with_kary.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]