Talk:Khizr Khan

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Lodi Dynasty was the last one

The Lodi dynasty was the last dynasty of the Sultanate. The article says that Sayyids came after Lodis. This is wrong. Somebody fix this.Netaji 07:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 August 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Arguments against moving are stronger. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:51, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Khizr Khan → Sayyid Khizr Khan – using his full name would more clearly distinguish him apart from Khizr Muazzam Khan and allow us to disambiguate them. Ranze (talk) 07:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – No need to suddenly change the usual name of a prominent historical figure because of the transient TV exposure of a contemporary namesake who will return to obscurity in short order. See WP:RECENTISM and the long-term significance criterion of WP:COMMONNAME. — JFG ^talk 00:41, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To help distinguish the subjects, I modified the hatnote on the monarch's page and added one on the lawyer's page. — JFG ^talk 00:54, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Sayyid is an honorific title (and "In general, styles and honorifics should not be included in front of the name"). The only source that is cited in the article that is readily accessible refers to him as "Khizar Khan", not "Sayyid Khizr Khan". Per WP:NCP: "Adding given names, or their abbreviations, merely for disambiguation purposes (if that format of the name is not commonly used to refer to the person) is not advised." There is no indication that "Sayyid Khizr Khan" is the WP:COMMONNAME of this person. Indeed, it is a red link, which appears to indicate that it is so uncommonly used that no one has even bothered to redirect it to an article. —BarrelProof (talk) 03:40, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Copy

Then someone set up a copy from this site https://www.mafiacorruption.pl/synonimy/Iqbal-Khan Ali banu sistani (talk) 20:33, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]