Talk:King Michael's Coup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Military history (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality assessment scale.
WikiProject Romania (Rated C-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Michael was not invited to the 60th anniversary of the V.E. Day by any Western Ally.[edit]

But people if you remember, the 60th anniversary the most Western heads of state celebrated in Russia. I see no surprise thus that he was also invited to Russia and not to a Western country at that anniversary. How they could invite him if the main celebration was in Moscow anyway?--MathFacts (talk) 07:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Recent changes[edit]

I have reverted recent changes by a user. First, whole paragraphs have been added that have no sources. Secondly, where sources have been added, those are outdated soviet era books. Last but not least, the language in those additions is simply so poor that it cannot stay in an encyclopedia. E.g. Romanian August Uprising or Romanian August Coup is a major political-military event happened at Romania during the late period of August 1944. This event began with a successful coup organized by king Mihai I of Romania toghether with the National Democratic Bloc (including Communist Party, Social Democracy Party, National Liberal Party and National Peasant Party) to overthrow the pro-German goverment of Ion Antonescu and create a nationalist and anti-Nazi government led by Constantin Sănătescu.. --Estlandia (Miacek) (dialogue) 13:02, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

First, there are many other paragraph have source. A lot of them.
Second, poor language can be improve. You cannot delete a whole work which costs a lot of time and health of the writer. Why don't you improve to show that how it can be corrected ?
I never know that wikipedia have the policy of delete source because of Soviet this, Soviet that. The only way to do counter POW is adding information from many points of view, not by selectively deleting some sources. Deleting like that is not neutral. It is censorship. Do not make this neutral wikipedia become a propaganda machine of CIA. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 13:48, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
The previous version had nothing to do with the 'propaganda machine of CIA'.Estlandia (Miacek) (dialogue) 14:03, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry I was extremely rude. But my opinion is: if an article is not neutral, the good way to do is add information and sources in other points of view, not deleting cited information. You can see that I did not delete the cited paragraph of the previous version. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 14:25, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

A different version available in Romania media.[edit]

Here is the official version of facts excluding lots of facts. Local media shows a completely different historical facts corroborated by UK and US archives. The version shows very low importance of Comunists and many political errors of the king that pushed Romania into a major post war mess. 392Michael (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)