This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 12:52, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
Hi. I added an album cover image to the article some time ago, so readers could see an image and work from this artist. I was notified this is not considered fair use of an album cover image (see deletion discussion. Okay. I have just removed that image from this page, since it is now available on the appropriate album page for the artist here: Kyotaku (Kokū Nishimura album). I trust this is sufficient. Cheers. --Ds13 (talk) 19:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Per instructions ("object to deletion for any reason") in the template left by User:Stefan2, I have removed the template. The assertion that there is no evidence of the subject's notability is false, in my opinion. Subject is notable within the field of shakuhachi music, evidenced by the one reference and at least the first two pages of Google search results for Nishimura Koku. I am not suggesting that a single reference in the article is sufficient, but that is a different discussion than notability. I would certainly agree with a "refimprove" or other maintenance tags being added. Regards. --Ds13 (talk) 05:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]