Talk:Lewis Carroll Epstein

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please do not delete this article as it is still under construction. The significance of the author will be clear if you read JDoolin's passage about his work at the bottom of the article.

In addition, Lewis Carroll Epstein's books have been republished for 30 years, so at least two generations of students have been influenced by them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcatkeson (talk • contribs) 16:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to this, apparently one of his books as been republished for 30 years. Deciding from this that "at least two generations of students have been influenced by them," is a classic example of original research. That conclusion needs a source of its own. DVdm (talk) 19:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Self-evident.Lestrade (talk) 21:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Original research and inappropriate external links

I have added a few citation tags. This all looks like original research. I also have removed two highly inappropriate external links - see edit summaries. DVdm (talk) 21:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed a bad inline citation and an inappropriate external link, both added by anon 12.190.158.6 (talk · contribs). Rationale in edit summaries [1] and [2]. DVdm (talk) 19:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently without any edit summary anon 68.98.155.115 (talk · contribs) added the bad citation again. I changed the statement to make it agree with the "source", which mentions one book only. DVdm (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lewis Carroll Epstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110824105821/http://physicsbookhub.blogspot.com/2011/03/thinking-physics-understandable.html to http://physicsbookhub.blogspot.com/2011/03/thinking-physics-understandable.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]