Jump to content

Talk:Linda Bresonik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who cares?

[edit]

Who cares about that Ms Bresonik is bisexual? That kind of information should not be part of Wikipedia articles. Do you want to mention that a majority is heterosexual? Is it necessary to mention that someone is gay, bisexual, masochistic, whatever? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kebne62 (talkcontribs) 13:49, February 12, 2008 (UTC)

I agree. This subject is notable because of her football, not her relationships, which are irrelevant. Furthermore, the paragraph was written in a breathless tabloid style which IMO has no place in Wikipedia. I have therefore deleted it. Beechnut (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If we have this information we write about spouses in each article. It is an integral part of the private life of that person. Regardless of her sexual preferences, why should we do that different for Linda Bresonik? I totally agree that tabloid style is inappropriate, though.
Regarding "not mentioning that somebody is heterosexual": We don't mention heterosexuality because if you don't tell somebody about the sexuality of a person we assume s/he is hetero. Discriminating? No, just human, most people are hetero (definitely no judgment implied) and it is just simpler for our mind to assume that a person we know nothing else about is hetero, too, adjusting that picture as new information becomes available. While somebody might find this offensive it is just --as far as science knows-- a basic principle of how our mind works. OdinFK (talk) 09:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The point you're all missing is that it doesn't seem to be sourced that she is a bisexual. 86.41.73.224 (talk) 00:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which ancestral country is from?

[edit]

Which country Ms Bresonik's ancestor from? Allo002 (talk) 26 October 2008

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Linda Bresonik. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]