This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2017. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
Misleading representation of events in paragraph 3[edit]
I am new to Wikipedia so I am sorry in advance if I do something wrong.
I believe that a part of the third paragraph of this article is misleading in its representation of the Fox News interview. Specifically, "Carlson responded by calling Durden "hostile and separatist and crazy" and "demented"", which is misleading as in the interview these comments from Carlson were clearly aimed at what Durden was saying, and not her person. I also believe this is an inappropriate adapted quote because a large amount of Carlson's other speech is completely omitted, leaving only the speech that would make the neutral reader believe that Carlson was attacking Durden. This is clearly different from the impression the actual interview would have on such a reader.
Here is a recording of the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcKQF2hrmeM (the channel is likely biased based on the name, but it is clear that the footage is unedited).
The source used for the referenced passage in this article is The Washington Post, not the interview itself. Analyzing the interview from your point of view (or the point of view of a YouTube commenter) is original research and not permitted on Wikipedia. Funcrunch (talk) 04:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: Presenting a YouTube commenter's view (without additional analysis or editorializing) wouldn't be original research, but now I see the comment you refer to is just a quote from this Wikipedia article. Funcrunch (talk) 08:33, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
