Talk:Look for the Light

Look for the Light is currently a Television good article nominee. Nominated by – Rhain ☔ (he/him) at 06:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Look for the Light article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Look for the Light" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

A fact from Look for the Light appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the season finale of The Last of Us used real giraffes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Look for the Light.

Wikipedia

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Rick Jay Glen (1 participant)
Unreleased third Minecraft album (2 participants)
Kelly Metzger (4 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (9 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (5 participants; relisted)
Danny Mastrogiorgio (2 participants; relisted)
Police Trainer (3 participants; relisted)
Sephiroth (20 participants; relisted)
The Boss (Metal Gear) (6 participants; relisted)
Balloon Brothers (4 participants; relisted)
Enigma Engine (4 participants; relisted)
ClanLib (8 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 March 2023[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In Reception, please change "demonstrating terror, fragility, and terror" to "demonstrating terror and fragility" or something else to get rid of the echo. Neftalirr (talk) 19:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mz7 (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 15:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Ashley Johnson

... that Ashley Johnson (pictured), who portrayed Ellie in The Last of Us, played Ellie's mother Anna in the season finale of its television adaptation? Source: Los Angeles Times
- ALT1: ... that an alternative ending was filmed for the season finale of The Last of Us at HBO's request, but the showrunners removed it? Source: The New Yorker
- ALT2: ... that Ashley Johnson (pictured) watched videos of natural births to prepare for her role in the season finale of The Last of Us? Source: Los Angeles Times
- ALT3: ... that an actress attained a black eye while filming a fight scene for the season finale of The Last of Us? Source: TVLine
- ALT4: ... that the season finale of The Last of Us used real giraffes? Source: Variety
- ALT5: ... that the season finale of The Last of Us was filmed in unused floors of a hospital? Source: Variety
- Reviewed: The Care and Keeping of You
- Comment: Image with ALT0 and ALT2.

Converted from a redirect by Rhain (talk). Self-nominated at 01:09, 14 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Look for the Light; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Article is new enough and long enough. Cursory look shows no uncited claims. QPQ is done. Overall, everything looks—uh, oh. Earwig is showing a 93% copyvio likelihood based on IMD? This is probably a false positive assuming the IMDB editor took the info from the wiki page, but I'll need you to get back to me before I properly pass it. Assuming it gets passed, I'd go with any of the given hooks, except ALT5, which isn't too interesting. ALT1 is a bit confusing; did they accept the request, film the alternate ending, then remove it, or did they refuse to make the alternate ending altogether? Krisgabwoosh (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Krisgabwoosh: Thanks for the review! This is definitely a case of WP:MIRROR with IMDb; it's happened before with other episodes too. I've rephrased ALT1; hopefully it makes more sense. Let me know if there's anything else! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:37, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect, just making sure. Any of these alts look good to go. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I like ALT4 and I know they are real giraffes or live giraffes because I made the connection to the Calgary Zoo in the article. But perhaps we need to explicitly state it in the article "real giraffes". Bruxton (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Look for the Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Rhain (talk · contribs) 06:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this review Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain: I'll be awaiting your responses. Shouldn't take too much work. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): Several of the sources in the review section give ratings but the ratings aren't mentioned. Consider adding {{Template:TV ratings}} Several critics are named as Publication X's "Last name". For instance "Den of Geek's Boo" is mentioned three times, twice as "Den of Geek's Boo" in the last paragraph. Is there a better way to phrase it after the first mention? Perhaps as simply just Boo? b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): How reliable is EverythingGP, its used a few times. c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): A few things mostly just quotes, the episodes title and actor names. It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: Any negative reviews from good sources? If not is there anything that was critized? It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Good standerd text and alt text.
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Spot checks[edit]

Numbers from this revision [1].Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 Good
25 Good
28 Good
32 Good
33 Good
39 Good
46 Good

Drive by comment[edit]

@OlifanofmrTennant: It has been three weeks since your last edit on this page. Do you plan to continue the review or should it be closed so the article can wait for a different reviewer? -- Zoo Blazer 19:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry I completely forgot, I'll get on with it. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: Thanks for the review. To clarify your concerns: Den of Geek's Boo is a little repetitious but I believe it would be inconsistent and potentially confusing to rephrase, and the two uses are far apart anyway; EverythingGP is a local Grande Prairie publication, used here to verify uncontroversial production information; and there are several negative/critical comments in the Reception section, especially the last paragraph. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see the scattered negative thoughts. Upon looking through the sources it seems that you've taken as much as you can from the reviews. I specificlly called out Den of Geek at random, regardless I see your point. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]