This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 April 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
MelanieN, please note: Loreen Hall is an Olympic Quarter Finalist, as confirmed by the Official Olympic website, so there would be no need for her to make it APPEAR as though she reached the quarter final. It's an indisputable fact.
@sillyfolkboy...Thank you for updating the article with Loreen's missing relevant athletic achievements and for taking the time to explain how things work on Wiki, with regards to Wiki etiquette. I appreciate the work you've done and are doing across Wikipedia.
I am uncomfortable with what I see going on at the article right now. Yes, we agreed to keep the article and to make some changes requested by User:Berture77. But that doesn't mean we agreed to just let her write the article the way she wants! Berture, you need to read about our conflict of interest rules. We generally don't want people to actually edit articles about themselves, because they can't be neutral. When I see an edit like this, which removes the finish position (25) to replace it with QF (to show that she made the quarter finals), I am not sure that is allowed. User:Lugnuts, what would be the usual way of listing the results of this race? We need to do it in whatever is the standard Wikipedia fashion - not in some other way because it makes her look better. Berture, if you are going to continue to edit the article, please allow Lugnuts (or User:L1975p or others who are familiar with our policies on athletes) to have the final word about how things should be done - and if they make a change, accept it. Or discuss it here on the talk page. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 23:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Berture77: I've added the information on additional tournaments. If there anything else you feel is missing? Typically we ask that the subjects of the article do not edit their own article - this is to ensure that the article has a balanced perspective. Usually the best practice here is to leave the relevant information and sources on the talk page and request a neutral third party to make the edits for you (like I have done here).
In terms of the quality of the article about you, it's worth remembering this is a volunteer project (so things often get missed completely) and we can only include details that are covered by other sources (for athletics, sourcing is difficult to find once you go beyond major international competitions). On a personal note, I wouldn't consider your article here an affront on that point – many athletes have much slighter coverage. Consider Reese Hoffa, an Olympic medalist and world champion with a 20-year career whose article only has a short paragraph! As an example of the extent of coverage of British athletics, I only wrote the first proper article on the AAA Championships just two months ago, so we have much left to do. SFB22:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there's too much concern of the subject editing her own biography right now. They seem to have made one edit (excluding the blanking) which was easily verified and was written in a neutral way. I've seen much, much worse, esp. when an IP floods the edit hisotry of "their" article with dozens and dozens of edits (I usually revert them all in those cases). LugnutsFire Walk with Me07:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
