Jump to content

Talk:Margaret Brennan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

is she single? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.93.235 (talk) 00:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

She wears a wedding ring. MaynardClark (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Born in 1980 and she is a "senior" something as a "journalist"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.152.216.213 (talk) 23:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Margaret Brennan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pro Life/Pro Gun Control

[edit]

Are all the Pro Life proponents also Pro Gun Control proponents to actually save already living human beings? 2600:1700:1330:2550:619C:2E03:B8EE:D566 (talk) 16:52, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

bipartisan immigration bill

[edit]

bipartisan immigration bill. why do news commentators refuse to mention that this bill still allows 4,999 immigrants a day to cross the border before anything is triggered? this doesn't even count unaccompanied juveniles who are automatically allowed to cross the border and are not counted. this means 2 million immigrants a year can still cross the border. news commentators must explain how then this bipartisan immigration bill addresses the immigration problem. 2601:84:8480:8800:2D7E:67A2:6944:73FE (talk) 23:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]