Talk:Meg Foster
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Meg Foster article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]This has been wikified to the degree the amount of material allows. Therefore, I am removing the wikify tag KarenAnn 21:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Eyes
[edit]How is it possible to do an encyclopedia article about Meg Foster and say nothing about her eyes? Really... have you ever seen eyes like that on another actor or actress? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.96.101 (talk) 02:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Quite unbelievable it is, yes. 82.141.66.2 (talk) 19:00, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- there so beautiful 2001:5B0:270E:F2D8:91E6:F9D4:43A3:4233 (talk) 03:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Yes I would like to know what it is about her eyes that makes them so distinctive, they must have had an impact on casting her. 86.182.222.246 (talk) 15:28, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- I added a bit on them, but as this an old post I don't know if doing so is acceptable. It sounds like she has mentioned them in interviews though.--T. Anthony (talk) 12:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Cosby
[edit]I've removed the Cosby accusation because I'm satisfied that it's essentially gossip in this particular context. A third party has written about a serious alleged sexual assault on Foster and herself by a third party (Cosby). The story has not been acknowledged in any way by Foster and all we know is that she declined to be interviewed on the subject.
It's close, and I could be persuaded otherwise, but on balance I don't think it adds anything to this particular article. The material may be appropriate for the biographies of the other two people. --TS 17:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- To be honest I don't know if it belongs in the article or not. Foster herself has been silent about this and perhaps she has her reasons for that, who really knows. But I'm not sure if we should include this serious allegation that was made by another person about Foster. She herself has never made any such claims. Caden cool 04:46, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Meg Foster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131126005143/http://rowaytonkids.com/2013/02/23/the-fosters-of-ridgewood-drive/ to http://rowaytonkids.com/2013/02/23/the-fosters-of-ridgewood-drive/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Irrelevant citations
[edit]I have commented out two citations that appeared at the end of the lead because they did not contain any information in support of the lead's content. I moved a third elsewhere in the article because it does relate to that material. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- The same is true of www.dreadcentral.com. It contains nothing about Meg Foster; I have commented it out. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:34, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Night gallery
[edit]She also appeared in an 1972 episode of Night Gallery episode named Gallows in the Wind Franklove143 (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Start-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Low-importance Pennsylvania articles